Kouyos Roger D, Silander Olin K, Bonhoeffer Sebastian
Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich Universitätsstrasse 16, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Jun;22(6):308-15. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.02.014. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
Epistasis and the evolution of recombination are closely intertwined: epistasis generates linkage disequilibria (i.e. statistical associations between alleles), whereas recombination breaks them up. The mutational deterministic hypothesis (MDH) states that high recombination rates are maintained because the breaking up of linkage disequilibria generated by negative epistasis enables more efficient purging of deleterious mutations. However, recent theoretical and experimental work challenges the MDH. Experimental evidence suggests that negative epistasis, required by the MDH, is relatively uncommon. On the theoretical side, population genetic models suggest that, compared with the combined effects of drift and selection, epistasis generates a negligible amount of linkage disequilibria. Here, we assess these criticisms and discuss to what extent they invalidate the MDH as an explanation for the evolution of recombination.
上位性产生连锁不平衡(即等位基因之间的统计关联),而重组则打破这些不平衡。突变确定性假说(MDH)认为,高重组率得以维持是因为由负上位性产生的连锁不平衡的打破能够更有效地清除有害突变。然而,最近的理论和实验工作对MDH提出了挑战。实验证据表明,MDH所要求的负上位性相对不常见。在理论方面,群体遗传模型表明,与漂变和选择的综合效应相比,上位性产生的连锁不平衡数量可以忽略不计。在这里,我们评估这些批评意见,并讨论它们在多大程度上使MDH作为重组进化的一种解释失效。