Kalantar-Zadeh Kamyar, Kopple Joel D, Regidor Deborah L, Jing Jennie, Shinaberger Christian S, Aronovitz Jason, McAllister Charles J, Whellan David, Sharma Kumar
Harold Simmons Center for Kidney Disease Research and Epidemiology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California 90509-2910, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2007 May;30(5):1049-55. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2127. Epub 2007 Mar 2.
The optimal target for glycemic control has not been established in diabetic dialysis patients.
To address this question, the national database of a large dialysis organization (DaVita) was analyzed via time-dependent survival models with repeated measures.
Of 82,933 patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) in DaVita outpatient clinics over 3 years (July 2001 through June 2004), 23,618 diabetic MHD patients had A1C measurements at least once. Unadjusted survival analyses indicated paradoxically lower death hazard ratios (HRs) with higher A1C values. However, after adjusting for potential confounders (demographics, dialysis vintage, dose, comorbidity, anemia, and surrogates of malnutrition and inflammation), higher A1C values were incrementally associated with higher death risks. Compared with A1C in the 5-6% range, the adjusted all-cause and cardiovascular death HRs for A1C > or = 10% were 1.41 (95% CI 1.25-1.60) and 1.73 (1.44-2.08), respectively (P < 0.001). The incremental increase in death risk for rising A1C values was monotonic and robust in nonanemic patients (hemoglobin > 11.0 g/dl). In subgroup analyses, the association between A1C > 6% and increased death risk was more prominent among younger patients, those who had undergone dialysis for > 2 years, and those with higher protein intake (> 1 g x kg(-1) x day(-1)), blood hemoglobin (> 11 g/dl), or serum ferritin values (> 500 ng/ml).
In diabetic MHD patients, the apparently counterintuitive association between poor glycemic control and greater survival is explained by such confounders as malnutrition and anemia. All things equal, higher A1C is associated with increased death risk. Lower A1C levels not related to malnutrition or anemia appear to be associated with improved survival in MHD patients.
糖尿病透析患者的最佳血糖控制目标尚未确立。
为解决这一问题,通过具有重复测量的时间依赖性生存模型对一个大型透析机构(达维塔)的全国数据库进行了分析。
在达维塔门诊三年期间(2001年7月至2004年6月)接受维持性血液透析(MHD)的82933例患者中,23618例糖尿病MHD患者至少进行过一次糖化血红蛋白(A1C)测量。未经调整的生存分析表明,A1C值越高,死亡风险比(HRs)反而越低,这一结果有悖常理。然而,在对潜在混杂因素(人口统计学、透析时间、透析剂量合并症、贫血以及营养不良和炎症的替代指标)进行调整后,A1C值越高,死亡风险越高。与A1C在5%至6%范围相比,A1C≥10%时,经调整的全因死亡和心血管死亡HRs分别为1.41(95%可信区间1.25 - 1.60)和1.73(1.44 - 2.08)(P<0.001)。在非贫血患者(血红蛋白>11.0 g/dl)中,A1C值升高导致的死亡风险增加呈单调且稳定上升。在亚组分析中,A1C>6%与死亡风险增加之间的关联在年轻患者、透析时间超过2年的患者以及蛋白质摄入量较高(>1 g·kg⁻¹·d⁻¹)、血红蛋白(>11 g/dl)或血清铁蛋白值(>500 ng/ml)的患者中更为显著。
在糖尿病MHD患者中,血糖控制不佳与较高生存率之间看似违反直觉的关联可由营养不良和贫血等混杂因素来解释。在其他条件相同的情况下,较高的A1C与死亡风险增加相关。与营养不良或贫血无关的较低A1C水平似乎与MHD患者生存率提高相关。