Moya Pablo R, Berg Kelly A, Gutiérrez-Hernandez Manuel A, Sáez-Briones Patricio, Reyes-Parada Miguel, Cassels Bruce K, Clarke William P
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007 Jun;321(3):1054-61. doi: 10.1124/jpet.106.117507. Epub 2007 Mar 2.
2,5-Dimethoxy-4-substituted phenylisopropylamines and phenethylamines are 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) (5-HT)(2A/2C) agonists. The former are partial to full agonists, whereas the latter are partial to weak agonists. However, most data come from studies analyzing phospholipase C (PLC)-mediated responses, although additional effectors [e.g., phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2))] are associated with these receptors. We compared two homologous series of phenylisopropylamines and phenethylamines measuring both PLA(2) and PLC responses in Chinese hamster ovary-K1 cells expressing human 5-HT(2A) or 5-HT(2C) receptors. In addition, we assayed both groups of compounds as head shake inducers in rats. At the 5-HT(2C) receptor, most compounds were partial agonists for both pathways. Relative efficacy of some phenylisopropylamines was higher for both responses compared with their phenethylamine counterparts, whereas for others, no differences were found. At the 5-HT(2A) receptor, most compounds behaved as partial agonists, but unlike findings at 5-HT(2C) receptors, all phenylisopropylamines were more efficacious than their phenethylamine counterparts. 2,5-Dimethoxyphenylisopropylamine activated only the PLC pathway at both receptor subtypes, 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine was selective for PLC at the 5-HT(2C) receptor, and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-nitrophenethylamine was PLA(2)-specific at the 5-HT(2A) receptor. For both receptors, the rank order of efficacy of compounds differed depending upon which response was measured. The phenylisopropylamines were strong head shake inducers, whereas their phenethylamine congeners were not, in agreement with in vitro results and the involvement of 5-HT(2A) receptors in the head shake response. Our results support the concept of functional selectivity and indicate that subtle changes in ligand structure can result in significant differences in the cellular signaling profile.
2,5-二甲氧基-4-取代苯基异丙胺和苯乙胺是5-羟色胺(血清素)(5-HT)(2A/2C)激动剂。前者是部分至完全激动剂,而后者是部分至弱激动剂。然而,大多数数据来自分析磷脂酶C(PLC)介导反应的研究,尽管其他效应器[如磷脂酶A(2)(PLA(2))]与这些受体相关。我们比较了两个同源系列的苯基异丙胺和苯乙胺,测量了在中国仓鼠卵巢-K1细胞中表达人5-HT(2A)或5-HT(2C)受体时的PLA(2)和PLC反应。此外,我们在大鼠中测定了两组化合物作为摇头诱导剂的作用。在5-HT(2C)受体处,大多数化合物对两种途径都是部分激动剂。与它们的苯乙胺类似物相比,一些苯基异丙胺对两种反应的相对效力更高,而对于其他一些化合物,则未发现差异。在5-HT(2A)受体处,大多数化合物表现为部分激动剂,但与在5-HT(2C)受体处的发现不同,所有苯基异丙胺都比它们的苯乙胺类似物更有效。2,5-二甲氧基苯基异丙胺在两种受体亚型上仅激活PLC途径,2,5-二甲氧基苯乙胺在5-HT(2C)受体处对PLC具有选择性,而2,5-二甲氧基-4-硝基苯乙胺在5-HT(2A)受体处对PLA(2)具有特异性。对于两种受体,化合物效力的排序取决于所测量的反应。苯基异丙胺是强烈的摇头诱导剂,而它们的苯乙胺同系物则不是,这与体外结果以及5-HT(2A)受体参与摇头反应一致。我们的结果支持功能选择性的概念,并表明配体结构的细微变化可导致细胞信号传导谱的显著差异。