• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个基于历史的思想实验:应对儿童健康与福祉的新挑战。

A historically based thought experiment: meeting new challenges for children's health and well-being.

作者信息

Golden Janet, Markel Howard

机构信息

Rutgers University, Camden, New Jersey, USA>

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):445-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.445.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.445
PMID:17339672
Abstract

In fall 2004 we proposed a way to use the lessons of the past to inform U.S. children's health policy, given the increasingly critical needs of children in this country. Continuing in that tradition and beyond, we describe here the founding and early work of the Children's Bureau and consider how it might be a model for the near future. We propose the creation of a Department of Children's Affairs (DoCA), which would unite the various federal agency-level initiatives aimed at children's health and well-being, much as the Department of Homeland Security did for terrorism defense activities after 9/11.

摘要

鉴于美国儿童日益迫切的需求,2004年秋,我们提出了一种借鉴过去经验来为美国儿童健康政策提供参考的方法。秉承并超越这一传统,我们在此描述儿童局的创立及早期工作,并探讨它如何能够成为近期的典范。我们提议设立儿童事务部(DoCA),该部门将整合旨在促进儿童健康和福祉的各类联邦机构层面的举措,就如同国土安全部在9·11事件后整合反恐防御活动那样。

相似文献

1
A historically based thought experiment: meeting new challenges for children's health and well-being.一个基于历史的思想实验:应对儿童健康与福祉的新挑战。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):445-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.445.
2
Beyond medical care: how health systems can address children's needs through health promotion strategies.超越医疗护理:卫生系统如何通过健康促进策略满足儿童需求。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):466-73. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.466.
3
Rethinking the organization of children's programs: lessons from the elderly.重新思考儿童节目编排:来自老年人的经验教训。
Milbank Q. 1995;73(4):565-97.
4
New federal policy for children with special health care needs: implications for pediatricians.针对有特殊医疗需求儿童的新联邦政策:对儿科医生的影响。
Pediatrics. 1992 Sep;90(3):321-7.
5
Focusing on children's healthcare quality.关注儿童医疗保健质量。
Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 1999 Jan;11(1):2-10.
6
Integrating children's services in England: national evaluation of children's trusts.整合英格兰的儿童服务:对儿童信托基金的全国评估。
Child Care Health Dev. 2009 Mar;35(2):257-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00928.x. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
7
Quality medical homes: meeting children's needs for therapeutic and supportive services.优质医疗之家:满足儿童对治疗和支持性服务的需求。
Pediatrics. 2008 Jan;121(1):e127-34. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0066. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
8
Successes and missed opportunities in protecting our children's health: critical junctures in the history of children's health policy in the United States.保护我们孩子健康方面的成功与错失的机遇:美国儿童健康政策历史上的关键节点
Pediatrics. 2005 Apr;115(4 Suppl):1129-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2825D.
9
Children's public health policy in the United States: how the past can inform the future.美国儿童公共卫生政策:过去如何为未来提供借鉴。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Sep-Oct;23(5):147-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.5.147.
10
Beyond integration: challenges for children's mental health.超越整合:儿童心理健康面临的挑战
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 May-Jun;25(3):670-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.3.670.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning From History About Reducing Infant Mortality: Contrasting the Centrality of Structural Interventions to Early 20th-Century Successes in the United States to Their Neglect in Current Global Initiatives.从历史中学习降低婴儿死亡率:对比 20 世纪初美国结构性干预措施的核心地位与当前全球倡议对其的忽视。
Milbank Q. 2019 Mar;97(1):285-345. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12376.