• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对有特殊医疗需求儿童的新联邦政策:对儿科医生的影响。

New federal policy for children with special health care needs: implications for pediatricians.

作者信息

Ireys H T, Nelson R P

机构信息

Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1992 Sep;90(3):321-7.

PMID:1387706
Abstract

Title V of the Social Security Act of 1935 established the nation's first categorical health care program for children: the Crippled Children's Service. In 1985, federal legislation changed the name of the Crippled Children's Service to the Program for Children With Special Health Care Needs. Four years later, new amendments to Title V dramatically altered the Program's mission. States are now required to spend 30% of the funds from the Maternal and Child Health Services block grant on children with special health care needs and to take specific steps toward improving the service system for these children and their families. The new mandate is the only current foundation of a national health policy for children with special health care needs. The 1989 law substantially broadens the mission of the state programs and explicitly recognizes that all children with a special health care need should have access to an appropriate, community-based system of care monitored by state Children with Special Health Care Needs agencies. In addition, states are now required to conduct needs assessments pertaining to these children, to foster local systems of care, and to ensure a high quality of community-based services. Understanding the implications of the new amendments is essential because pediatricians and other child health care professionals have key roles to play in implementing these new policies.

摘要

1935年的《社会保障法》第五章设立了美国首个针对儿童的分类医疗保健项目:残疾儿童服务项目。1985年,联邦立法将残疾儿童服务项目更名为有特殊医疗保健需求儿童项目。四年后,第五章的新修正案极大地改变了该项目的使命。现在要求各州将母婴健康服务整笔拨款中的30%用于有特殊医疗保健需求的儿童,并采取具体措施改善针对这些儿童及其家庭的服务体系。这项新指令是目前针对有特殊医疗保健需求儿童的国家卫生政策的唯一基础。1989年的法律大幅拓宽了州项目的使命,并明确承认所有有特殊医疗保健需求的儿童都应能获得由州有特殊医疗保健需求儿童机构监管的、适当的、基于社区的医疗保健体系。此外,现在要求各州对这些儿童进行需求评估,建立地方医疗保健体系,并确保高质量的社区服务。理解新修正案的影响至关重要,因为儿科医生和其他儿童医疗保健专业人员在实施这些新政策方面发挥着关键作用。

相似文献

1
New federal policy for children with special health care needs: implications for pediatricians.针对有特殊医疗需求儿童的新联邦政策:对儿科医生的影响。
Pediatrics. 1992 Sep;90(3):321-7.
2
Children with special health care needs enrolled in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP): patient characteristics and health care needs.参加州儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)的有特殊医疗保健需求的儿童:患者特征与医疗保健需求。
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e508.
3
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
4
Using existing population-based data sets to measure the American Academy of Pediatrics definition of medical home for all children and children with special health care needs.利用现有的基于人群的数据集,衡量美国儿科学会对所有儿童及有特殊医疗保健需求儿童的医疗之家定义。
Pediatrics. 2004 May;113(5 Suppl):1529-37.
5
Interagency coordination: the key to mainstreaming children with special needs into day care.跨部门协调:将有特殊需求的儿童纳入日托服务主流的关键。
Pediatrics. 1994 Dec;94(6 Pt 2):1059-61.
6
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.
7
Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.在孩子被诊断为残疾前后满足家长的需求:对一项由关键工作者提供信息、支持和联络的新项目的评估。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e477-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0240.
8
Family planning funding through four federal-state programs, FY 1997.1997财年通过四个联邦-州项目提供的计划生育资金。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Jul-Aug;31(4):176-81.
9
Ryan White CARE Act Title IV programs: a preliminary characterization of benefits and costs.《瑞安·怀特艾滋病紧急救援计划》第四章项目:效益与成本的初步描述
AIDS Public Policy J. 2005 Fall-Winter;20(3-4):108-25.
10
Rethinking the organization of children's programs: lessons from the elderly.重新思考儿童节目编排:来自老年人的经验教训。
Milbank Q. 1995;73(4):565-97.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric Evaluation of a Consumer-Developed Family-Centered Care Assessment Tool.消费者开发的以家庭为中心的护理评估工具的心理测量评估
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Sep;19(9):1899-909. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1709-y.
2
Conceptualizing childhood health problems using survey data: a comparison of key indicators.利用调查数据对儿童健康问题进行概念化:关键指标比较
BMC Pediatr. 2007 Dec 5;7:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-7-40.
3
The financial implications of availability and quality of a usual source of care for children with special health care needs.
为有特殊医疗需求的儿童提供常规医疗服务的可及性和质量所产生的财务影响。
Matern Child Health J. 2008 Mar;12(2):243-59. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0233-0. Epub 2007 Jun 8.
4
Unmet need and problems accessing specialty medical and related services among children with special health care needs.有特殊医疗需求儿童在获得专科医疗及相关服务方面未得到满足的需求和问题。
Matern Child Health J. 2006 Mar;10(2):201-16. doi: 10.1007/s10995-005-0041-3. Epub 2005 Dec 29.
5
Factors associated with health care access for Mississippi children with special health care needs.与密西西比州有特殊医疗需求儿童的医疗保健可及性相关的因素。
Matern Child Health J. 2005 Jun;9(2 Suppl):S23-31. doi: 10.1007/s10995-005-3964-9.