Alou L, Giménez M J, Sevillano D, Aguilar L, González N, Echeverría O, Torrico M, Coronel P, Prieto J
Microbiology Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Avda.Complutense s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Apr;59(4):652-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm015. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
To investigate the bactericidal activity, against Haemophilus influenzae strains exhibiting different resistance phenotypes, of simulated serum concentrations obtained in humans after administration of 400 mg of cefditoren twice daily, 500 mg of cefuroxime twice daily, 875/125 mg of co-amoxiclav twice daily or 875/125 mg of co-amoxiclav three times daily.
An in vitro computerized pharmacodynamic simulation was carried out and colony counts determined over 24 h. Four H. influenzae strains were used, one ampicillin-susceptible strain (Strain 1) and three ampicillin-resistant strains following CLSI and BSAC breakpoints: one beta-lactamase-positive strain with an MIC of co-amoxiclav of 0.5 mg/L (Strain 2), one beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant strain (BLNAR; ampicillin MIC = 16 mg/L) (Strain 3) and one beta-lactamase-positive strain with an MIC of co-amoxiclav of 4 mg/L (Strain 4). All strains were susceptible to cefuroxime and co-amoxiclav according to current CLSI breakpoints, but Strains 3 and 4 were resistant according to BSAC breakpoints. All strains exhibited cefditoren MIC <or= 0.12 mg/L.
Bacterial counts of Strains 1 and 2 were >or= 6 log(10) reduced with all antibiotics tested at 12 and 24 h. Against Strains 3 and 4, log(10) reductions at 12 and 24 h were significantly higher for cefditoren versus cefuroxime (P < 0.01) (although both exhibited bactericidal activity, i.e. >or= 3 log(10) reduction) and versus the two co-amoxiclav regimens (P < 0.001) (that exhibited negligible initial inocula reductions).
Cefditoren exhibited the highest bactericidal activity maintained over time against ampicillin-resistant H. influenzae, regardless of beta-lactamase production and/or BLNAR phenotype. From the pharmacodynamic perspective, BSAC breakpoints seem more adequate to define or detect BLNAR strains.
研究每日两次服用400mg头孢妥仑、每日两次服用500mg头孢呋辛、每日两次服用875/125mg阿莫西林克拉维酸或每日三次服用875/125mg阿莫西林克拉维酸后,人体获得的模拟血清浓度对表现出不同耐药表型的流感嗜血杆菌菌株的杀菌活性。
进行体外计算机化药效学模拟,并在24小时内测定菌落计数。使用了4株流感嗜血杆菌菌株,1株对氨苄西林敏感的菌株(菌株1)和3株根据CLSI和BSAC断点判定的对氨苄西林耐药的菌株:1株β-内酰胺酶阳性菌株,阿莫西林克拉维酸的MIC为0.5mg/L(菌株2),1株β-内酰胺酶阴性氨苄西林耐药菌株(BLNAR;氨苄西林MIC = 16mg/L)(菌株3)和1株β-内酰胺酶阳性菌株,阿莫西林克拉维酸的MIC为4mg/L(菌株4)。根据当前CLSI断点,所有菌株对头孢呋辛和阿莫西林克拉维酸敏感,但根据BSAC断点,菌株3和4耐药。所有菌株的头孢妥仑MIC≤0.12mg/L。
在12小时和24小时时,所有测试抗生素对菌株1和2的细菌计数减少≥6 log₁₀。对于菌株3和4,在12小时和24小时时,头孢妥仑的log₁₀减少量显著高于头孢呋辛(P < 0.01)(尽管两者均表现出杀菌活性,即减少≥3 log₁₀),且高于两种阿莫西林克拉维酸给药方案(P < 0.001)(这两种方案对初始接种量的减少可忽略不计)。
无论β-内酰胺酶产生情况和/或BLNAR表型如何,头孢妥仑对氨苄西林耐药的流感嗜血杆菌表现出随时间维持的最高杀菌活性。从药效学角度来看,BSAC断点似乎更适合定义或检测BLNAR菌株。