Kärpänoja Pauliina, Nissinen Antti, Huovinen Pentti, Sarkkinen Hannu
Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Keskussairaalankatu 7, FIN-15850 Lahti.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Apr;53(4):660-3. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh134. Epub 2004 Feb 18.
The objective of this multicentre study was to define the accuracy and reproducibility of the NCCLS disc diffusion method for Haemophilus influenzae against ampicillin and co-amoxiclav in Finnish clinical microbiology laboratories. Special attention was paid to the ability of the laboratories to detect beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant (BLNAR) strains.
Three BLNAR and two beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin-susceptible isolates (BLNAS)-originating from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and UK National External Quality Assessment (UKNEQAS) schemes-were included in this study. Susceptibility tests for these isolates were performed in 26 clinical microbiology laboratories, in accordance with NCCLS guidelines. Additionally, low-strength discs for ampicillin (2 microg) and co-amoxiclav (3 microg) were tested.
The low-strength discs for ampicillin and co-amoxiclav categorized more accurately BLNAR and BLNAS H. influenzae isolates than did the high-strength discs recommended by the NCCLS. In addition, the high-strength discs produced more major errors than the low-strength discs (22 versus six for ampicillin and 40 versus seven for co-amoxiclav). Great variation occurred in the method regardless of the antibiotic concentration of the discs.
The use of low-content ampicillin and co-amoxiclav discs is recommended for the susceptibility testing of H. influenzae. Interpretative criteria of S > or = 17 mm and R < or = 13 mm for both discs are suggested.
本多中心研究的目的是确定芬兰临床微生物实验室中,美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)纸片扩散法检测流感嗜血杆菌对氨苄西林和阿莫西林克拉维酸敏感性的准确性和可重复性。特别关注实验室检测β-内酰胺酶阴性氨苄西林耐药(BLNAR)菌株的能力。
本研究纳入了3株BLNAR菌株和2株β-内酰胺酶阴性氨苄西林敏感(BLNAS)菌株,它们分别来自美国模式培养物集存库(ATCC)和英国国家外部质量评估(UKNEQAS)计划。按照NCCLS指南,在26个临床微生物实验室对这些菌株进行了药敏试验。此外,还对低强度的氨苄西林(2微克)和阿莫西林克拉维酸(3微克)纸片进行了测试。
与NCCLS推荐的高强度纸片相比,低强度的氨苄西林和阿莫西林克拉维酸纸片能更准确地对BLNAR和BLNAS流感嗜血杆菌菌株进行分类。此外,高强度纸片产生的主要错误比低强度纸片更多(氨苄西林分别为22个和6个,阿莫西林克拉维酸分别为40个和7个)。无论纸片的抗生素浓度如何,该方法都存在很大差异。
建议使用低含量的氨苄西林和阿莫西林克拉维酸纸片进行流感嗜血杆菌的药敏试验。建议两种纸片的解释标准均为S≥17毫米和R≤13毫米。