Statins in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome: an analysis of dose and class effects in typical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of statins of different treatment intensity used to treat elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in typical care settings.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using linked hospital and pharmacy claims data.

SETTING

Statewide pharmacy benefits programmes in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

PARTICIPANTS

18,311 Medicare patients discharged alive after ACS who received a prescription for a statin within 90 days of hospital discharge.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Using multivariable and propensity-matched Cox proportional hazards regression models, patients who were prescribed high-intensity and moderate-intensity statins were compared based on the drug-dose combination that they initially received. Individual drug-dose combinations were also compared. Our primary outcome was the composite of all-cause death or recurrent ACS.

RESULTS

Patients who received moderate-intensity statins were as likely to experience a primary outcome as patients treated with high-intensity statins (adjusted HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.08). Propensity matching did not change the results. Individually, all moderate-intensity statins were as effective as high-intensity atorvastatin with the exception of lovastatin (adjusted HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.36). Similarly, all high-intensity statins seem as effective as high-intensity atorvastatin but the CIs surrounding these estimates were wide.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of elderly patients with ACS treated in typical care settings does not demonstrate the superiority of high-intensity over moderate-intensity statin treatment or significant differences among individual statins.