Chen Guiquan, Chen Karen S, Kobayashi Dione, Barbour Robin, Motter Ruth, Games Dora, Martin Stephen J, Morris Richard G M
Laboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience, Centre for Cognitive and Neural Systems, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom.
J Neurosci. 2007 Mar 7;27(10):2654-62. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3710-06.2007.
The behavioral and biochemical impact of active immunization against human beta-amyloid (Abeta) was assessed using male transgenic (Tg) mice overexpressing a human mutant amyloid precursor protein (heterozygous PDAPP mice) and littermate controls. Administration of aggregated Abeta42 occurred at monthly intervals from 7 months ("prevention") or 11 months ("reversal"), followed by double-blind behavioral training at 16 months on a cued task, then serial spatial learning in a water maze. Using a 2 x 2 design, with Abeta42 adjuvanted with MPL-AF (adjuvant formulation of monophosphoryl lipid A) or MPL-AF alone, PDAPP mice were impaired compared with non-Tg littermates on two separate measures of serial spatial learning. Immunization caused no overall rescue of learning but limited the accumulation of total Abeta and Abeta42 levels in cortex and hippocampus by up to 60%. In immunized PDAPP mice, significant negative correlations were observed between hippocampal and cortical Abeta levels and learning capacity, particularly in the prevention study, and correlations between learning capacity and antibody titer. Moreover, a subset of PDAPP mice with very low Abeta levels (hippocampal Abeta levels of <6000 ng/g or cortical Abeta levels of <1000 ng/g) was indistinguishable from non-Tg controls. Mice in the prevention study were also rescued from cognitive impairment more effectively than those in the reversal study. The combination of variability in antibody response and differential levels of Abeta accumulation across the population of immunized PDAPP mice may be responsible for success in cognitive protection with only a subset of these animals, but the similarity to the findings of certain human vaccination trials is noteworthy.
使用过表达人类突变淀粉样前体蛋白的雄性转基因(Tg)小鼠(杂合子PDAPP小鼠)及其同窝对照,评估了针对人类β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)主动免疫的行为和生化影响。从7个月龄(“预防”)或11个月龄(“逆转”)开始,每月间隔给予聚集的Aβ42,随后在16个月龄时对线索任务进行双盲行为训练,然后在水迷宫中进行系列空间学习。采用2×2设计,将Aβ42与MPL-AF(单磷酰脂质A的佐剂配方)或单独的MPL-AF佐剂联合使用,在两项独立的系列空间学习测量中,与非Tg同窝对照相比,PDAPP小鼠存在缺陷。免疫并未总体上挽救学习能力,但使皮质和海马中总Aβ和Aβ42水平的积累最多减少了60%。在免疫的PDAPP小鼠中,观察到海马和皮质Aβ水平与学习能力之间存在显著负相关,特别是在预防研究中,以及学习能力与抗体滴度之间的相关性。此外,Aβ水平非常低(海马Aβ水平<6000 ng/g或皮质Aβ水平<1000 ng/g)的一部分PDAPP小鼠与非Tg对照无差异。预防研究中的小鼠比逆转研究中的小鼠更有效地从认知障碍中得到挽救。免疫的PDAPP小鼠群体中抗体反应的变异性和Aβ积累水平的差异相结合,可能是只有一部分动物在认知保护方面取得成功的原因,但与某些人类疫苗试验结果的相似性值得注意。