Miranda C P, Liu J, Kadar A, Janosi A, Froning J, Lehmann K G, Froelicher V F
Cardiology Department, Long Beach Veterans Affairs Medical Center, California.
Am J Cardiol. 1992 Feb 1;69(4):303-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90224-m.
Multiple lead systems are shown to have a higher sensitivity than that of single leads for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) during exercise testing, but the value of ST-segment depression isolated to the inferior leads is questionable. To ascertain the diagnostic accuracy of inferior limb lead II compared with that of precordial lead V5, a retrospective analysis of 173 men was performed (108 in a training population and 65 in a validation cohort). All patients had a standard exercise test and underwent diagnostic coronary angiography within 15 days of the exercise test (range 1 to 65). Sixty-three patients had greater than or equal to 1 coronary stenoses greater than or equal to 70%, or left main lesion greater than or equal to 50%, whereas 45 patients in the training population did not. Exclusion criteria were female sex, left ventricular hypertrophy, left bundle branch block or resting ST-segment depression on the baseline electrocardiogram, previous myocardial infarction or revascularization procedures, and any significant valvular or congenital heart disease. Lead V5 had a better combination of sensitivity (65%) and specificity (84%) (chi-square = 24.11; p less than 0.001) than that of lead II (sensitivity 71%, specificity 44%) (chi-square = 2.25; p = 0.13) at a single cut point, and this improved specificity was substantial (95% confidence interval for observed difference 22 to 58%). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis also revealed that lead V5 (area = 0.759) was markedly superior to lead II (area = 0.582) over multiple cut points (z = 3.032; 2p = 0.002).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
