Suppr超能文献

传统托槽与自锁托槽的治疗效率:弓丝尺寸和材料的影响

Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire size and material.

作者信息

Turnbull Nicholas R, Birnie David J

机构信息

Orthodontic Department, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Mar;131(3):395-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.018.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In this prospective clinical study, we assessed the relative speed of archwire changes, comparing self-ligating brackets with conventional elastomeric ligation methods, and further assessed this in relation to the stage of orthodontic treatment represented by different wire sizes and types.

METHODS

The time taken to remove and ligate archwires for 131 consecutive patients treated with either self-ligating or conventional brackets was prospectively assessed. The study was carried out in the orthodontic department of a district general hospital in the United Kingdom. The main outcome measure was the time to remove or place elastomeric ligatures or open/close self-ligating brackets for 2 matched groups of fixed appliance patients: Damon2 self-ligating bracket (SDS Ormco, Orange, Calif) and a conventional mini-twin bracket (Orthos, SDS Ormco). The relative effects of various wire sizes and materials on ligation times were investigated. The study was carried out by 1 operator experienced in the use of self-ligating and conventional brackets.

RESULTS

The Damon2 self-ligating system had a significantly shorter mean archwire ligation time for both placing (P <.001) and removing (P <.01) wires compared with the conventional elastomeric system. Ligation of an archwire was approximately twice as quick with the self-ligating system. Opening a Damon slide was on average 1 second quicker per bracket than removing an elastic from the mini-twin brackets, and closing a slide was 2 seconds faster per bracket. This difference in ligation time between the Damon2 and the conventional mini-twin brackets became more marked for larger wire sizes used in later treatment stages.

CONCLUSIONS

The type of bracket and the size of wire used are statistically significant predictors for speed of ligation and chairside time. The self-ligating system offered quicker and arguably more efficient wire removal and placement for most orthodontic treatment stages.

摘要

引言

在这项前瞻性临床研究中,我们评估了弓丝更换的相对速度,比较了自锁托槽与传统弹性结扎方法,并进一步根据不同尺寸和类型的弓丝所代表的正畸治疗阶段进行了评估。

方法

前瞻性评估了131例接受自锁或传统托槽治疗的连续患者更换和结扎弓丝所需的时间。该研究在英国一家地区综合医院的正畸科进行。主要观察指标是两组匹配的固定矫治器患者拆除或放置弹性结扎圈或打开/关闭自锁托槽的时间:Damon2自锁托槽(SDS Ormco,加利福尼亚州奥兰治)和传统的迷你双托槽(Orthos,SDS Ormco)。研究了各种弓丝尺寸和材料对结扎时间的相对影响。该研究由一名有自锁和传统托槽使用经验的操作人员进行。

结果

与传统弹性结扎系统相比,Damon2自锁系统在放置弓丝(P <.001)和拆除弓丝(P <.01)时的平均弓丝结扎时间明显更短。自锁系统结扎弓丝的速度大约快两倍。打开一个Damon滑动夹平均每个托槽比从迷你双托槽上取下一个弹性结扎圈快1秒,关闭一个滑动夹每个托槽快2秒。在治疗后期使用的较大尺寸弓丝时,Damon2与传统迷你双托槽之间的结扎时间差异更为明显。

结论

托槽类型和所用弓丝尺寸是结扎速度和椅旁时间的统计学显著预测因素。自锁系统在大多数正畸治疗阶段提供了更快且可说是更高效的弓丝拆除和放置。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验