Icardi Andrea, Sacco Paolo, Salvatore Francesca, Romano Umberto
Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, La Colletta Hospital, Arenzano, Genoa - Italy.
J Nephrol. 2007 Jan-Feb;20(1):73-9.
Equivalence of intravenous (i.v.) and subcutaneous (s.c.) dosage requirements is a notable characteristic of darbepoetin-alpha (DPO), as opposed to other epoetins (EPOs). Currently in Europe, the EPOs/DPO conversion factor (200 IU EPOs = 1 microg DPO) does not take into account the route of drugs administration. To better define this ratio we have conducted a prospective, long-term trial in a group of hemodialysis patients.
At the start, we evaluated 40 iron-replete hemodialysis patients, but the final study was performed in the remaining 25 patients. During the first 6 months, patients were on i.v. epoetin-alpha (EPOalpha) maintenance therapy (phase 1: T-6 to T0). After conversion to i.v. DPO (initial 200:1 ratio) the observation was prolonged for a period of 12 months (phase 2: T0 to T12). DPO was administered at extended dose intervals and the EPOalpha/DPO rate was adjusted every month to maintain hemoglobin (Hgb) stability. Iron status and factors inhibiting erythropoiesis were continually checked to exclude unstable patients.
Phase 1: EPOalpha weekly mean dose showed no significant variation. Phase 2: EPOalpha/DPO conversion factor progressively rose from 200 to 256.7 +/- 86.9 IU/microg at T7 (p<0.005) and 336.8 +/- 104.3 IU/microg at T12 (p<0.0005). DPO weekly mean dosage decreased from 40.0 +/- 12.0 microg/week at T0 to 31.6 +/- 3.7 microg/week at T7 (p<0.005) and 24.6 +/- 7.0 microg/week at T12 (p<0.0005). Mean weekly/patient acquisition cost of EPOalpha was euro 70.6 +/- 21.3 (T-6 to T0); after switching, the cost of DPO was euro 72.4 +/- 22.7 (T0) and fell to euro 53.1 +/- 11.2 during T6 to T12.
The progressive increase of EPOalpha/DPO ratio demonstrated that i.v. DPO requires lower doses compared with i.v. EPOalpha. When drugs are administered i.v., the starting EPOalpha/DPO conversion factor should be increased over the 200:1 ratio, similar to recommendations outlined in the United States and Japan. DPO dose reduction translated to notable cost-savings.
与其他促红细胞生成素(EPO)相比,静脉注射(i.v.)和皮下注射(s.c.)剂量需求的等效性是α-达贝泊汀(DPO)的一个显著特征。目前在欧洲,EPO/DPO转换因子(200 IU EPO = 1 μg DPO)未考虑药物给药途径。为了更好地确定这个比例,我们在一组血液透析患者中进行了一项前瞻性长期试验。
开始时,我们评估了40例铁储备充足的血液透析患者,但最终研究在其余25例患者中进行。在最初六个月期间,患者接受静脉注射促红细胞生成素α(EPOα)维持治疗(第1阶段:T - 6至T0)。转换为静脉注射DPO(初始比例为200:1)后,观察期延长12个月(第2阶段:T0至T12)。DPO以延长的剂量间隔给药,并且每月调整EPOα/DPO比率以维持血红蛋白(Hgb)稳定。持续检查铁状态和抑制红细胞生成的因素以排除不稳定患者。
第1阶段:EPOα每周平均剂量无显著变化。第2阶段:EPOα/DPO转换因子从200逐渐升至T7时的256.7±86.9 IU/μg(p < 0.005)和T12时的336.8±104.3 IU/μg(p < 0.0005)。DPO每周平均剂量从T0时的40.0±12.0 μg/周降至T7时的31.6±3.7 μg/周(p < 0.005)和T12时的24.6±7.0 μg/周(p < 0.0005)。EPOα每位患者每周的平均获取成本为70.6±21.3欧元(T - 6至T0);转换后,DPO的成本为72.4±22.7欧元(T0),在T6至T12期间降至53.1±11.2欧元。
EPOα/DPO比率的逐渐增加表明,与静脉注射EPOα相比,静脉注射DPO所需剂量更低。当静脉给药时,起始EPOα/DPO转换因子应高于200:1的比例,这与美国和日本概述的建议类似。DPO剂量的减少转化为显著的成本节约。