Bonafont Xavier, Bock Andreas, Carter Dave, Brunkhorst Reinhard, Carrera Fernando, Iskedjian Michael, Molemans Bart, Dehmel Bastian, Robbins Sean
Department of Pharmacy , University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol , Badalona , Spain.
Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau , Switzerland.
NDT Plus. 2009 Oct;2(5):347-53. doi: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfp097. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
Background. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) such as epoetin alfa and beta, and darbepoetin alfa have improved the management of anaemia secondary to chronic kidney disease. Numerous studies have reported a dose reduction when patients receiving dialysis were converted from epoetin to darbepoetin alfa using the starting dose conversion of 200:1 as indicated on the prescribing label by the European Medicines Agency. The objective of this meta-analysis was to summarize the existing body of scientific evidence to evaluate the potential dose savings when comparing epoetin alfa or beta to darbepoetin alfa. Method. Medline and EmBase were searched to identify all published trials investigating ESA treatment in anaemic patients receiving dialysis and converted from epoetins to darbepoetin alfa. We selected prospective randomized controlled, non-randomized and observational studies involving patients on dialysis that compared epoetin and darbepoetin alfa dosing. Results. Of 573 articles identified, 9 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in our analysis. The overall percentage dose savings attained when dialysis patients were converted from epoetin to darbepoetin alfa was 30% (range: 4%-44%). Greater dose savings were noted with intravenous administration (33%) compared with subcutaneous (27%) and between switch-over studies (31%) and RCTs (27%). In all studies, target haemoglobin levels were maintained before and after conversion. Conclusion. This meta-analysis demonstrates that when using an initial 200:1 conversion ratio, as indicated on the European label, from epoetin to darbepoetin, a subsequent reduction in dose was observed and an average 30% dose savings could be achieved.
背景。促红细胞生成素α和β以及阿法达贝泊汀等促红细胞生成剂改善了慢性肾病继发性贫血的治疗。许多研究报告称,接受透析的患者按照欧洲药品管理局处方标签上所示的200:1起始剂量转换比例,从促红细胞生成素转换为阿法达贝泊汀时,剂量有所降低。本荟萃分析的目的是总结现有科学证据,以评估将促红细胞生成素α或β与阿法达贝泊汀α进行比较时潜在的剂量节省情况。方法。检索了Medline和EmBase,以识别所有已发表的关于接受透析且从促红细胞生成素转换为阿法达贝泊汀α的贫血患者的促红细胞生成剂治疗试验。我们选择了涉及透析患者的前瞻性随机对照、非随机和观察性研究,比较促红细胞生成素和阿法达贝泊汀α的给药情况。结果。在识别出的573篇文章中,9项研究符合纳入标准并被纳入我们的分析。透析患者从促红细胞生成素转换为阿法达贝泊汀α时实现的总体剂量节省百分比为30%(范围:4%-44%)。与皮下给药(27%)相比,静脉给药(33%)以及转换研究(31%)和随机对照试验(27%)中观察到更大的剂量节省。在所有研究中,转换前后的目标血红蛋白水平均得以维持。结论。本荟萃分析表明,按照欧洲标签所示,使用最初200:1的转换比例从促红细胞生成素转换为阿法达贝泊汀时,随后观察到剂量降低,平均可实现30%的剂量节省。