• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对差异:全球战略的核心挑战。

Managing differences: the central challenge of global strategy.

作者信息

Ghemawat Pankaj

机构信息

IESE Business School, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Harv Bus Rev. 2007 Mar;85(3):58-68, 140.

PMID:17348170
Abstract

The main goal of any international strategy should be to manage the large differences that arise at the borders of markets. Yet executives often fail to exploit market and production discrepancies, focusing instead on the tensions between standardization and localization. In this article, Pankaj Ghemawat presents a new framework that encompasses all three effective responses to the challenges of globalization. He calls it the AAA Triangle. The A's stand for the three distinct types of international strategy. Through adaptation, companies seek to boost revenues and market share by maximizing their local relevance. Through aggregation, they attempt to deliver economies of scale by creating regional, or sometimes global, operations. And through arbitrage, they exploit disparities between national or regional markets, often by locating different parts of the supply chain in different places--for instance, call centers in India, factories in China, and retail shops in Western Europe. Ghemawat draws on several examples that illustrate how organizations use and balance these strategies and describes the trade-offs they make as they do so. Because most enterprises should draw from all three A's to some extent, the framework can be used to develop a summary scorecard indicating how well the company is globalizing. However, given the tensions among the strategies, it's not enough simply to tick off the corresponding boxes. Strategic choice requires some degree of prioritization--and the framework can help with that as well. While it is possible to make progress on all three strategies, companies usually must focus on one or two when trying to build competitive advantage.

摘要

任何国际战略的主要目标都应该是应对市场边界出现的巨大差异。然而,企业高管往往未能利用市场和生产方面的差异,而是将重点放在标准化和本地化之间的矛盾上。在本文中,潘卡基·格玛沃特提出了一个新框架,该框架涵盖了应对全球化挑战的所有三种有效应对措施。他将其称为AAA三角。A代表三种不同类型的国际战略。通过适应性调整,公司试图通过最大化其在当地的相关性来提高收入和市场份额。通过聚合,它们试图通过创建区域或有时是全球运营来实现规模经济。而通过套利,它们利用国家或地区市场之间的差异,通常是将供应链的不同部分设在不同的地方——例如,将呼叫中心设在印度,工厂设在中国,零售店设在西欧。格玛沃特列举了几个例子来说明组织如何运用和平衡这些战略,并描述了它们在这样做时所做出的权衡。由于大多数企业在某种程度上都应该借鉴这三种A战略,因此该框架可用于制定一份总结记分卡,以表明公司在全球化方面的表现如何。然而,鉴于这些战略之间的矛盾,仅仅勾选相应的选项是不够的。战略选择需要一定程度的优先级排序——而该框架也能在这方面提供帮助。虽然在所有三种战略上都取得进展是可能的,但企业在试图建立竞争优势时通常必须专注于其中一两种战略。

相似文献

1
Managing differences: the central challenge of global strategy.应对差异:全球战略的核心挑战。
Harv Bus Rev. 2007 Mar;85(3):58-68, 140.
2
Regional strategies for global leadership.全球领导力的区域战略。
Harv Bus Rev. 2005 Dec;83(12):98-108, 153.
3
What is a global manager?什么是全球经理?
Harv Bus Rev. 2003 Aug;81(8):101-8, 141.
4
The forgotten strategy.被遗忘的策略。
Harv Bus Rev. 2003 Nov;81(11):76-84, 139.
5
The hidden dragons.卧虎藏龙
Harv Bus Rev. 2003 Oct;81(10):92-9, 137.
6
Competing with giants. Survival strategies for local companies in emerging markets.与巨头竞争。新兴市场本土企业的生存策略。
Harv Bus Rev. 1999 Mar-Apr;77(2):119-29, 187.
7
Managing global accounts.管理全球客户账户。
Harv Bus Rev. 2007 Sep;85(9):102-11, 150.
8
The great transition.重大转变。
Harv Bus Rev. 2003 Oct;81(10):70-81, 137.
9
Competing on analytics.基于分析进行竞争。
Harv Bus Rev. 2006 Jan;84(1):98-107, 134.
10
Strategy as simple rules.作为简单规则的策略。
Harv Bus Rev. 2001 Jan;79(1):106-16, 176.

引用本文的文献

1
The world economy will need globalization in the post-pandemic 2021 decade.在疫情后的2021年代,世界经济将需要全球化。
J Int Bus Stud. 2022;53(1):156-171. doi: 10.1057/s41267-020-00394-y. Epub 2021 Feb 1.