Ring Haim, Itzkovich Malka, Dynia Aida
Departments of Neurological Rehabilitation C, Loewenstein Hospital-Rehabilitation Center, Raanana, Israel.
Isr Med Assoc J. 2007 Feb;9(2):102-6.
Measurement of function is an essential component of routine rehabilitation work (mainly for quantifying function at different phases in the rehabilitation process), rehabilitation policy (admission and discharge criteria, length of stay in rehabilitation), goal setting, and outcome measurement.
To explore the scope of the scales used for function assessment by the various disciplines of rehabilitation medicine in rehabilitation facilities.
A structured questionnaire was sent to 36 rehabilitation facilities. Respondents were asked to specify the scales they use for functional assessment for each of 15 selected pathologies. Also examined were satisfaction with the scales, as well as the existence of a computerized database of routine function assessment in the facility and the willingness to create a national agreed "common data set" of the assessments.
The general response rate was 86.1% (31 of 36 questionnaires were returned). For the sake of data presentation, rehabilitation facilities were classified into four categories: general, geriatric, pediatric, and community. Most facilities performed function assessment using a total of 125 scales. Heterogeneity was found between facilities and between pathologies. The highest number of scales was found in the area of neurologic pathologies. For most pathologies, assessment of impairment was used more than assessment of disability. Most facilities in the survey did not have a computerized database of function assessments.
A common data set of function assessments in everyday clinical work would ensure standardization without necessarily limiting the use of additional scales and at the same time significantly minimize the current heterogeneity.
功能测量是常规康复工作的重要组成部分(主要用于量化康复过程中不同阶段的功能)、康复政策(入院和出院标准、康复住院时间)、目标设定及结果测量。
探讨康复机构中康复医学各学科用于功能评估的量表范围。
向36家康复机构发放结构化问卷。要求受访者指明他们针对15种选定病症中的每一种所使用的功能评估量表。还调查了对这些量表的满意度,以及机构中是否存在常规功能评估的计算机化数据库,以及创建全国统一的评估“通用数据集”的意愿。
总体回复率为86.1%(共返回36份问卷中的31份)。为便于数据呈现,将康复机构分为四类:综合、老年、儿科和社区。大多数机构总共使用125种量表进行功能评估。在机构之间以及病症之间发现了异质性。神经病症领域使用的量表数量最多。对于大多数病症,损伤评估的使用多于残疾评估。调查中的大多数机构没有功能评估的计算机化数据库。
日常临床工作中的功能评估通用数据集将确保标准化,而不一定限制额外量表的使用,同时显著减少当前的异质性。