• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Does processing of emotional stimuli predict symptomatic improvement and diagnostic recovery from major depression?对情绪刺激的处理是否能预测重度抑郁症的症状改善和诊断康复?
Emotion. 2007 Feb;7(1):201-6. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.201.
2
Selective attention to emotional faces following recovery from depression.抑郁症康复后对情绪面孔的选择性注意。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2007 Feb;116(1):80-5. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.116.1.80.
3
Attentional biases for negative interpersonal stimuli in clinical depression.临床抑郁症中对负面人际刺激的注意偏向。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2004 Feb;113(1):121-35. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.113.1.121.
4
Coherence and specificity of information-processing biases in depression and social phobia.抑郁症和社交恐惧症中信息加工偏差的连贯性和特异性。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2004 Aug;113(3):386-98. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.113.3.386.
5
Respiratory sinus arrhythmia reactivity to a sad film predicts depression symptom improvement and symptomatic trajectory.对悲伤影片的呼吸性窦性心律不齐反应可预测抑郁症状的改善及症状轨迹。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2016 Jan;99:108-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
6
Cognitive processing of emotional information in depression, panic, and somatoform disorder.抑郁症、恐慌症和躯体形式障碍中情绪信息的认知加工
J Abnorm Psychol. 2005 Feb;114(1):50-61. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.114.1.50.
7
Sense of coherence and recovery from major depression: a 4-year follow-up.连贯感与重度抑郁症的康复:一项4年随访研究
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2009 Apr;23(2):119-27. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
8
Attentional biases and the persistence of sad mood in major depressive disorder.注意偏向与重性抑郁障碍中悲伤情绪的持续。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2013 Feb;122(1):74-85. doi: 10.1037/a0029211. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
9
Subgenual cingulate and visual cortex responses to sad faces predict clinical outcome during antidepressant treatment for depression.前扣带回皮质下和视觉皮层对悲伤面孔的反应可预测抗抑郁治疗抑郁症期间的临床结局。
J Affect Disord. 2010 Jan;120(1-3):120-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.04.031.
10
Updating positive and negative stimuli in working memory in depression.在抑郁症中更新工作记忆中的正负刺激。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Nov;139(4):654-64. doi: 10.1037/a0020283.

引用本文的文献

1
Latent Structure and Item Functioning of Self-Referent Encoding Task Word Stimuli in Preadolescent Youth.青春期前青少年自我参照编码任务单词刺激的潜在结构和项目功能
Assessment. 2025 Oct;32(7):1103-1119. doi: 10.1177/10731911241289249. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
2
Increased memory accuracy of previous mood states in depressed patients in daily life.抑郁患者在日常生活中对先前情绪状态的记忆准确性增加。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 13;14(1):27881. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78483-3.
3
The Value of Extracting Clinician-Recorded Affect for Advancing Clinical Research on Depression: Proof-of-Concept Study Applying Natural Language Processing to Electronic Health Records.提取临床医生记录的情感对推进抑郁症临床研究的价值:将自然语言处理应用于电子健康记录的概念验证研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 12;6(5):e34436. doi: 10.2196/34436.
4
Exercise enhances: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial on aerobic exercise as depression treatment augmentation.运动增强:一项关于有氧运动作为抑郁症治疗辅助手段的随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 9;20(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02989-z.
5
Covariation bias in depression - a predictor of treatment response?抑郁中的共变偏差——治疗反应的预测因子?
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2019 Dec;126(12):1653-1665. doi: 10.1007/s00702-019-02091-z. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
6
Emotional Biases and Recurrence in Major Depressive Disorder. Results of 2.5 Years Follow-Up of Drug-Free Cohort Vulnerable for Recurrence.重度抑郁症中的情绪偏见与复发:复发易感性无药物治疗队列2.5年随访结果
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 28;10:145. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00145. eCollection 2019.
7
A Longitudinal Investigation of Cognitive Self-schemas across Adolescent Development.青少年发展过程中认知自我图式的纵向研究。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Mar;48(3):635-647. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-00981-1. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
8
'I Am Worthless and Kind'; the specificity of positive and negative self-evaluation in adolescent depression.“我一文不值却很善良”:青少年抑郁中积极和消极自我评价的特异性。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2019 Sep;58(3):260-273. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12215. Epub 2018 Dec 16.
9
Determining optimal parameters of the self-referent encoding task: A large-scale examination of self-referent cognition and depression.确定自我参照编码任务的最佳参数:自我参照认知与抑郁的大规模考察
Psychol Assess. 2018 Nov;30(11):1527-1540. doi: 10.1037/pas0000602. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
10
A Computerized Version of the Scrambled Sentences Test.句子重组测试的计算机化版本。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 9;8:2310. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02310. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
2
Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders.对情绪障碍的认知易感性。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:167-95. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143916.
3
Coherence and specificity of information-processing biases in depression and social phobia.抑郁症和社交恐惧症中信息加工偏差的连贯性和特异性。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2004 Aug;113(3):386-98. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.113.3.386.
4
Autobiographical memory predicts cognitive but not somatic change in sleep apnea patients vulnerable for affective disorder.自传体记忆可预测易患情感障碍的睡眠呼吸暂停患者的认知变化,但不能预测其躯体变化。
J Affect Disord. 2004 Jul;81(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(03)00170-8.
5
Cognitive vulnerability in remitted depressed children and adolescents.缓解期抑郁儿童和青少年的认知易损性。
Behav Res Ther. 2004 Apr;42(4):423-37. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00151-7.
6
Processing of emotional information in seasonal depression across different cognitive measures.季节性抑郁症中不同认知测量方式下的情绪信息处理
J Abnorm Psychol. 2004 Feb;113(1):116-26. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.113.1.116.
7
A rating scale for depression.一种抑郁症评定量表。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23(1):56-62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56.
8
Cognitive styles and life events interact to predict bipolar and unipolar symptomatology.认知风格与生活事件相互作用,以预测双相情感障碍和单相情感障碍的症状表现。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1999 Nov;108(4):567-78. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.108.4.567.
9
Some methodological issues in assessing attentional biases for threatening faces in anxiety: a replication study using a modified version of the probe detection task.评估焦虑中对威胁性面孔的注意偏向的一些方法学问题:一项使用探测任务修改版的重复研究
Behav Res Ther. 1999 Jun;37(6):595-604. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00158-2.
10
Attributions for positive life events predict recovery from depression among psychiatric inpatients: an investigation of the Needles and Abramson model of recovery from depression.积极生活事件的归因方式可预测精神科住院患者的抑郁康复情况:对抑郁康复的“尼德尔斯和阿布拉姆森模型”的一项调查。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998 Apr;66(2):369-76.

对情绪刺激的处理是否能预测重度抑郁症的症状改善和诊断康复?

Does processing of emotional stimuli predict symptomatic improvement and diagnostic recovery from major depression?

作者信息

Johnson Sheri L, Joormann Jutta, Gotlib Ian H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.

出版信息

Emotion. 2007 Feb;7(1):201-6. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.201.

DOI:10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.201
PMID:17352575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2847494/
Abstract

This study was designed to examine whether processing of emotional stimuli predicts both symptomatic improvement and recovery from depression. Participants diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) (N=63) completed information-processing tasks to assess attention to and memory for sad, physically threatening, socially threatening, and happy stimuli. At a follow-up session an average of nine months later, participants were reassessed to determine diagnostic status and depression severity. None of the measure of attention or memory predicted diagnostic status at follow-up. Those depressed participants who remembered a higher proportion of positive words that they had endorsed as self-descriptive exhibited greater symptomatic improvement. After controlling for memory of positive self-referential words, attentional measures did not predict symptomatic change. These results are consistent with a growing literature highlighting the importance of emotionally relevant memory processes for understanding the course of major depression.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨对情绪刺激的加工是否能预测抑郁症患者症状的改善及康复情况。63名被诊断为重度抑郁症(MDD)的参与者完成了信息加工任务,以评估对悲伤、身体威胁、社交威胁和快乐刺激的注意力及记忆力。在平均九个月后的随访阶段,对参与者重新进行评估以确定诊断状态及抑郁严重程度。注意力或记忆力的各项测量指标均无法预测随访时的诊断状态。那些记住较高比例曾认可为自我描述性的积极词汇的抑郁参与者,症状改善更为明显。在控制了对积极自我参照词汇的记忆后,注意力测量指标无法预测症状变化。这些结果与越来越多的文献一致,这些文献强调了与情绪相关的记忆过程对于理解重度抑郁症病程的重要性。