Panagiotakos Demosthenes B, Tzima Natalia, Pitsavos Christos, Chrysohoou Christina, Zampelas Antonis, Toussoulis Dimitris, Stefanadis Christodoulos
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
J Am Coll Nutr. 2007 Feb;26(1):32-8. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2007.10719583.
We investigated the association between adherence to Mediterranean diet and fasting indices of glucose homoeostasis, in a Greek adult population.
During 2001-2002 we randomly enrolled 1514 men and 1528 women (18-89 years old) without history of CVD, from the Attica area. Diabetes mellitus (type 2) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) were defined according to the established ADA criteria. Insulin resistance was evaluated by HOMA-IR. Dietary habits were assessed through a validated food frequency questionnaire and a diet score (range 0-55) was developed (higher values means greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet).
The overall prevalence of diabetes type 2 was 7.9% in men and 6.0% in women (P = 0.05). Mean diet score was 26.3 +/- 6.8 in normoglycemic, 25.7 +/- 6.4 in IFG and 22.2 +/- 5.8 in diabetic subjects (p < 0.001). In normoglycemic subjects who were in the upper tertile of the diet score we observed 7% lower glucose (p < 0.05), 5% lower insulin (p < 0.05) and 15% lower HOMA-IR (p < 0.01) levels compared to subjects in the lower tertile of the diet score. Additionally, in diabetic/IFG participants who where in the upper tertile of the diet score we observed 15% lower glucose (p < 0.05), 15% lower insulin (p < 0.05) and 27% lower HOMA-IR (p < 0.01) levels compared to those in the lower tertile. However, multiple regression analysis, adjusted for age, sex, BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, physical activity, smoking status, and presence of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, confirmed the previous associations in normoglycemic, but not in diabetic/IFG people.
An inverse association was observed between adherence to Mediterranean diet and indices of glucose homeostasis, only in normoglycemic people.
我们在希腊成年人群中研究了坚持地中海饮食与空腹血糖稳态指标之间的关联。
在2001年至2002年期间,我们从阿提卡地区随机招募了1514名男性和1528名女性(年龄在18 - 89岁之间),这些人无心血管疾病史。根据既定的美国糖尿病协会(ADA)标准定义2型糖尿病和空腹血糖受损(IFG)。通过稳态模型评估法(HOMA - IR)评估胰岛素抵抗。通过一份经过验证的食物频率问卷评估饮食习惯,并制定了饮食评分(范围为0 - 55)(分数越高意味着对地中海饮食的依从性越高)。
男性2型糖尿病的总体患病率为7.9%,女性为6.0%(P = 0.05)。血糖正常者的平均饮食评分为26.3±6.8,空腹血糖受损者为25.7±6.4,糖尿病患者为22.2±5.8(p < 0.001)。与饮食评分处于较低三分位数的受试者相比,饮食评分处于较高三分位数的血糖正常受试者的血糖水平低7%(p < 0.05),胰岛素水平低5%(p < 0.05),稳态模型评估法(HOMA - IR)水平低15%(p < 0.01)。此外,与饮食评分处于较低三分位数的糖尿病/空腹血糖受损参与者相比,饮食评分处于较高三分位数的参与者的血糖水平低15%(p < 0.05),胰岛素水平低15%(p < 0.05),稳态模型评估法(HOMA - IR)水平低27%(p < 0.01)。然而,在对年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、腰臀比、身体活动情况、吸烟状况以及高血压和高胆固醇血症的存在情况进行校正的多元回归分析中,证实了在血糖正常者中存在上述关联,但在糖尿病/空腹血糖受损者中不存在。
仅在血糖正常者中观察到坚持地中海饮食与血糖稳态指标之间存在负相关。