van Bogaert Donna Knapp
Faculty of Health Sciences, Steve Biko Centre for Bioethics, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.
Dev World Bioeth. 2007 Apr;7(1):35-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2007.00184.x.
Like other so-called 'parallel' practices in medicine, traditional medicine (TM) does not avoid criticism or even rejection. Nyika's article 'Ethical and Regulatory Issues Surrounding African Traditional Medicine in the Context of HIV/AIDS' looks at some of the issues from a traditional Western ethical perspective and suggests that it should be rejected. I respond to this article agreeing with Nyika's three major criticisms: lack of informed consent, confidentiality and paternalism. However, as traditional healers are consulted by over 70% of South Africans before any other type of healthcare professional, a blanket negation of TM is not possible, nor is it politically feasible. A pragmatic approach would be to work within the current structures for positive change. I point out that, as all cultural practices do, TM will change over time. Yet, until some regulations and change occur, the problem of harm to patients remains a major concern.
与医学中其他所谓的“平行”疗法一样,传统医学(TM)也无法避免批评甚至遭到摒弃。尼卡的文章《艾滋病毒/艾滋病背景下围绕非洲传统医学的伦理与监管问题》从传统西方伦理视角审视了其中一些问题,并建议摒弃传统医学。我对这篇文章做出回应,认同尼卡提出的三大批评:缺乏知情同意、保密问题和家长式作风。然而,超过70%的南非人在咨询其他任何类型的医疗保健专业人员之前,都会先咨询传统治疗师,因此全面否定传统医学既不可能,在政治上也不可行。一种务实的做法是在现有架构内努力推动积极变革。我指出,与所有文化习俗一样,传统医学也会随着时间推移而发生变化。然而,在一些法规出台并实现变革之前,对患者造成伤害的问题仍是一个主要担忧。