Krzymowska Magdalena, Konopka-Postupolska Dorota, Sobczak Miroslaw, Macioszek Violetta, Ellis Brian E, Hennig Jacek
Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics PAS, Pawinskiego 5a, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.
Plant J. 2007 Apr;50(2):253-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03046.x. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
Tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum cv. Xanthi-nc) infiltrated with either of two pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae- an avirulent strain of P. syringae pv. tabaci (Pst) or the non-host pathogen P. syringae pv. maculicola M2 (Psm) - developed a hypersensitive response (HR). There were considerable differences in HR phenotype, timing and sequence of cell dismantling between the two pathosystems. Following Psm infiltration, the first macroscopic signs were visible at 4.5 h post-infiltration (hpi). Simultaneously, increased plasma membrane permeability was observed, suggesting that the loss of cell membrane integrity initiates the macroscopic HR evoked by Psm. In contrast, after Pst treatment there was a distinct time lapse between the first signs of tissue collapse (9 hpi) and the occurrence of plasma membrane discontinuity (12 hpi). Ultrastructural studies of cells undergoing the HR triggered by Psm and Pst revealed distinct patterns of alterations in morphology of organelles. Moreover, while different forms of nuclear degeneration were observed in leaf zones infiltrated with Pst, we failed to detect any abnormalities in the nuclei of Psm-treated tissue. In addition, application of synthetic caspase inhibitors (Ac-DEVD-CHO, Ac-YVAD-CMK) abolished HR induced by Pst, but not Psm. Our observations suggest that different cell death mechanisms are executed in response to Psm and Pst. Interestingly, pre-inoculation with Pst, but not with Psm, induced a long-distance acquired resistance (LDAR) response, even though locally a typical set of defense responses, including acquired resistance, was activated locally in response to Psm. The failure of Psm to induce LDAR may be due to the rapid degeneration of bundle sheath cells resulting from Psm infection.
用丁香假单胞菌的两个致病变种——丁香假单胞菌烟草致病变种(Pst)的无毒菌株或非寄主病原菌丁香假单胞菌黄斑致病变种M2(Psm)——中的任何一种浸润烟草植株(烟草品种Xanthi-nc),都会引发超敏反应(HR)。在这两种病理系统之间,HR表型、细胞解体的时间和顺序存在相当大的差异。在Psm浸润后,浸润后4.5小时(hpi)可见到最初的宏观迹象。同时,观察到质膜通透性增加,这表明细胞膜完整性的丧失引发了由Psm诱发的宏观HR。相比之下,在Pst处理后,组织塌陷的最初迹象(9 hpi)与质膜连续性的出现(12 hpi)之间存在明显的时间间隔。对由Psm和Pst触发的HR过程中的细胞进行超微结构研究,揭示了细胞器形态改变的不同模式。此外,虽然在用Pst浸润的叶区观察到了不同形式的核退化,但我们在Psm处理的组织细胞核中未检测到任何异常。此外,应用合成的半胱天冬酶抑制剂(Ac-DEVD-CHO、Ac-YVAD-CMK)消除了由Pst诱导的HR,但没有消除由Psm诱导的HR。我们的观察结果表明,针对Psm和Pst会执行不同的细胞死亡机制。有趣的是,用Pst而非Psm进行预先接种会诱导长距离获得性抗性(LDAR)反应,尽管在局部,一组典型的防御反应,包括获得性抗性,会因Psm而被局部激活。Psm未能诱导LDAR可能是由于Psm感染导致维管束鞘细胞迅速退化。