• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学教育者对急诊医学教学培训工作坊的认知和实践影响。

Faculty perceptions and practice impact of a faculty development workshop on emergency medicine teaching.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

CJEM. 2005 Sep;7(5):321-7. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500014512.

DOI:10.1017/s1481803500014512
PMID:17355693
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Faculty development initiatives to improve emergency department (ED) teaching are compromised by the paucity of information about what behaviours and characteristics are desirable in an emergency medicine (EM) teacher.

OBJECTIVES

To design and evaluate a learner-centred, interactive faculty development workshop based on original ED teaching research.

METHODS

Registrants for a university-based faculty development workshop on ED teaching completed a needs assessment and pre-workshop self-reflection exercise. Responses were grouped into 3 themes derived from the ambulatory teaching literature and a recent survey of expert clinical EM teachers and learners. Participants underwent a half-day workshop consisting of 1 large group interactive session and 3 small group sessions using role playing, practice reflection, real time review of hard copy resources, and brainstorming. Evaluation included a post-event ordinal scale questionnaire and a 4-month follow-up short answer survey, both measuring participants' perceptions of workshop effectiveness.

RESULTS

Fifteen faculty participated. The needs assessment identified "Common mistakes," "Teaching efficiently" and "Dealing with the difficult learner" as themes. All 15 completed evaluations, rating the workshop as relevant (4.6/5), specific to their needs (4.4/5) and useful (4.5/5). At 4 months, 10 out of 10 respondents reported success at implementing new techniques and 8 reported greater confidence in teaching. The most common new techniques were: setting better learning objectives, giving better feedback, actively seeking teaching opportunities, and identifying a teaching point.

CONCLUSIONS

Learner-centred faculty development meets perceived needs of faculty and can result in participants trying new teaching strategies.

摘要

背景

改善急诊部(ED)教学的教师发展计划因缺乏关于急诊医学(EM)教师所需行为和特征的信息而受到影响。

目的

根据原始的 ED 教学研究设计和评估以学习者为中心、互动式的教师发展研讨会。

方法

参加大学基础 ED 教学教师发展研讨会的注册者完成了需求评估和会前自我反思练习。回应被分为 3 个主题,这些主题来自于门诊教学文献和最近对专家临床 EM 教师和学习者的调查。参与者参加了为期半天的研讨会,其中包括 1 个大型互动小组会议和 3 个小组会议,使用角色扮演、实践反思、实时审查纸质资源和头脑风暴。评估包括事件后有序量表问卷和 4 个月的简短后续调查,两者都衡量参与者对研讨会效果的看法。

结果

15 名教师参加了研讨会。需求评估确定了“常见错误”、“高效教学”和“处理困难学习者”作为主题。所有 15 名参与者都完成了评估,将研讨会评为相关(4.6/5)、针对他们的需求(4.4/5)和有用(4.5/5)。在 4 个月时,10 名参与者中的 10 名报告成功实施了新技术,8 名报告了更大的教学信心。最常见的新技术是:设定更好的学习目标、提供更好的反馈、积极寻找教学机会和确定教学要点。

结论

以学习者为中心的教师发展满足了教师的感知需求,并能促使参与者尝试新的教学策略。

相似文献

1
Faculty perceptions and practice impact of a faculty development workshop on emergency medicine teaching.医学教育者对急诊医学教学培训工作坊的认知和实践影响。
CJEM. 2005 Sep;7(5):321-7. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500014512.
2
What do emergency medicine learners want from their teachers? A multicenter focus group analysis.急诊医学学习者希望从他们的教师那里得到什么?一项多中心焦点小组分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Sep;12(9):856-61. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.04.022.
3
Faculty development seminars based on the one-minute preceptor improve feedback in the ambulatory setting.基于一分钟带教模式的教师发展研讨会可改善门诊环境中的反馈情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Oct;17(10):779-87. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.11233.x.
4
Evaluating "ED STAT!": a novel and effective faculty development program to improve emergency department teaching.评估“急诊速报!”:一项旨在改善急诊科教学的新颖且有效的教师发展计划。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;13(10):1062-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.05.025. Epub 2006 Aug 31.
5
A Systematic Approach to Working With Medical Learners in Difficulty: A Faculty Development Workshop.应对学习困难医学生的系统方法:教师发展研讨会
MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Jan 31;16:10872. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10872.
6
Microteaching and standardized students support faculty development for clinical teaching.微格教学和标准化病人有助于临床教学的师资发展。
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):941. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00048.
7
An orientation to wellness for new faculty of medicine members: meeting a need in faculty development.面向医学新教员的健康指导:满足教员发展需求
Int J Med Educ. 2016 Aug 4;7:255-60. doi: 10.5116/ijme.578a.2064.
8
Creating effective learning in today's emergency departments: how accomplished teachers get it done.在当今的急诊科开展有效的学习:优秀教师是如何做到的。
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Mar;45(3):253-61. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.08.007.
9
Preparing Residents for Teaching Careers: The Faculty for Tomorrow Resident Workshop.为住院医师的教学职业生涯做好准备:明日教员住院医师研讨会
Fam Med. 2017 Mar;49(3):225-229.
10
Using standardised students in faculty development workshops to improve clinical teaching skills.在教师发展研讨班中使用标准化病人以提高临床教学技能。
Med Educ. 2003 Jul;37(7):621-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01556.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Top emergency medicine faculty development papers since 2000: A Delphi study.2000年以来顶级急诊医学教师发展论文:一项德尔菲研究。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Mar 22;7(2):e10854. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10854. eCollection 2023 Apr.