Suppr超能文献

交替好氧-缺氧系统与传统活性污泥系统的比较。

Comparison between alternating aerobic-anoxic and conventional activated sludge systems.

作者信息

Balku Saziye

机构信息

Atilim University Industrial Liaison Office, Ostim, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Water Res. 2007 May;41(10):2220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.01.046. Epub 2007 Mar 13.

Abstract

Conventional activated sludge systems ensure removal of colloidal and dissolved carbonaceous organic matter whereas alternating aerobic-anoxic systems, in addition, satisfy a further reduction in nitrogen content of wastewater. Main difference between them is that the alternating system should also include an anoxic operation mode which satisfies denitrification. In other words conventional systems are operated under aerobic conditions whereas alternating systems require a periodical change from aerobic conditions to anoxic conditions. So the most important problem in alternating systems is to find the appropriate durations for both sequences. In this study a comparison between conventional and alternating systems is considered in terms of nitrogen removal and aeration time by simulation under the same conditions together with an optimization algorithm. The results show that an activated sludge system can be operated as an alternating aerobic-anoxic system so that nitrogen removal is also possible during treatment without any additional investment or operational cost.

摘要

传统活性污泥系统可确保去除胶体和溶解性含碳有机物,而交替好氧 - 缺氧系统除此之外,还能使废水中的氮含量进一步降低。它们之间的主要区别在于,交替系统还应包括满足反硝化作用的缺氧运行模式。换句话说,传统系统在好氧条件下运行,而交替系统需要从好氧条件定期转变为缺氧条件。因此,交替系统中最重要的问题是为两个阶段找到合适的时长。在本研究中,通过在相同条件下进行模拟并结合优化算法,从脱氮和曝气时间方面对传统系统和交替系统进行了比较。结果表明,活性污泥系统可以作为交替好氧 - 缺氧系统运行,从而在处理过程中无需任何额外投资或运营成本即可实现脱氮。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验