Dawwas M F, Gimson A E, Lewsey J D, Copley L P, van der Meulen J H P
Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Box 210, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.
Gut. 2007 Nov;56(11):1606-13. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.111369. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
Surgical mortality in the US is widely perceived to be superior to that in the UK. However, previous comparisons of surgical outcome in the two countries have often failed to take sufficient account of case-mix or examine long-term outcome. The standardised nature of liver transplantation practice makes it uniquely placed for undertaking reliable international comparisons of surgical outcome. The objective of this study is to undertake a risk-adjusted disease-specific comparison of both short- and long-term survival of liver transplant recipients in the UK and Ireland with that in the US.
A multicentre cohort study using two high quality national databases including all adults who underwent a first single organ liver transplant in the UK and Ireland (n = 5925) and the US (n = 41,866) between March 1994 and March 2005. The main outcome measures were post-transplant mortality during the first 90 days, 90 days to 1 year and beyond the first year, adjusted for recipient and donor characteristics.
Risk-adjusted mortality in the UK and Ireland was generally higher than in the US during the first 90 days (HR 1.17; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.29), both for patients transplanted for acute liver failure (HR 1.27; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.60) and those transplanted for chronic liver disease (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.31). Between 90 days and 1 year post-transplantation, no statistically significant differences in overall risk-adjusted mortality were noted between the two cohorts. Survivors of the first post-transplant year in the UK and Ireland had lower overall risk-adjusted mortality than those transplanted in the US (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96). This difference was observed among patients transplanted for chronic liver disease (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96), but not those transplanted for acute liver failure (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.70 to 1.50).
Whilst risk-adjusted mortality is higher in the UK and Ireland during the first 90 days following liver transplantation, it is higher in the US among those liver transplant recipients who survived the first post-transplant year. Our results are consistent with the notion that the US has superior acute perioperative care whereas the UK appears to provide better quality chronic care following liver transplantation surgery.
在美国,人们普遍认为外科手术死亡率低于英国。然而,此前两国手术结果的比较往往没有充分考虑病例组合情况,也未对长期结果进行考察。肝移植手术的标准化特性使其在进行可靠的国际手术结果比较方面具有独特优势。本研究的目的是对英国和爱尔兰与美国肝移植受者的短期和长期生存情况进行风险调整后的疾病特异性比较。
一项多中心队列研究,使用两个高质量的国家数据库,纳入1994年3月至2005年3月期间在英国、爱尔兰(n = 5925)和美国(n = 41866)接受首次单器官肝移植的所有成年人。主要观察指标为移植后前90天、90天至1年以及1年后的死亡率,并根据受者和供者特征进行调整。
在移植后的前90天,英国和爱尔兰经风险调整后的死亡率总体高于美国(风险比[HR] 1.17;95%置信区间[CI] 1.07至1.29),无论是因急性肝衰竭接受移植的患者(HR 1.27;95% CI 1.01至1.60)还是因慢性肝病接受移植的患者(HR 1.18;95% CI 1.07至1.31)。在移植后90天至1年期间,两个队列的总体风险调整后死亡率无统计学显著差异。英国和爱尔兰移植后第一年的幸存者经风险调整后的总体死亡率低于在美国接受移植的患者(HR 0.88;95% CI 0.81至0.96)。这种差异在因慢性肝病接受移植的患者中观察到(HR 0.88;95% CI 0.81至0.96),但在因急性肝衰竭接受移植的患者中未观察到(HR 1.02;95% CI 0.70至1.50)。
虽然在肝移植后的前90天,英国和爱尔兰经风险调整后的死亡率较高,但在美国,那些在移植后第一年存活下来的肝移植受者中,死亡率更高。我们的结果与以下观点一致,即美国在急性围手术期护理方面更具优势,而英国在肝移植手术后似乎能提供质量更好的慢性护理。