• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死后出院患者的生存率及循证药物治疗

Survival of patients discharged after acute myocardial infarction and evidence-based drug therapy.

作者信息

Gouya Ghazaleh, Reichardt Berthold, Ohrenberger Gerald, Wolzt Michael

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Allgemeines Krankenhaus Wien, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22(3):145-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-006-9087-9. Epub 2007 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1007/s10654-006-9087-9
PMID:17356927
Abstract

There is consensus that patients should be treated with antiplatelet agents, beta-blockers, ACE-inhibitors/ARBs, and lipid lowering drugs for secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but this evidence-based pharmacotherapy is underutilized. A quality improvement program was conducted in the Austrian county of Burgenland to emphasize the importance of cardiovascular drug therapy at hospital discharge in patients with AMI. In this prospective cohort study 250 members of a regional health insurance company, Burgenländische Gebietskrankenkasse (BGKK), with AMI during the year 2003 were identified using BGKK database. Discharge prescriptions and pharmacy reimbursement data of all included patients were determined. Overall prescription rate for patients discharged from hospital after AMI (n = 207) was 86% for platelet aggregation inhibitors, 77% for ACE-inhibitors or ARBs, 72% for beta-blockers, and 68% for a lipid lowering agent including statins. The all-cause mortality rate during a mean follow-up period of 552 days was 20%. Hazard ratio (HR) for death of patients with maximum 2 medications vs. those receiving 3 or 4 medications was 2.23 (95% CI: 1.19-4.18; p = 0.012). These data demonstrate that use of evidence-based drug treatment for prevention of mortality in patients with AMI is associated with risk reduction and survival benefit. Continuous quality improvement initiatives serve to improve outcome after AMI.

摘要

目前已达成共识,急性心肌梗死(AMI)后患者应接受抗血小板药物、β受体阻滞剂、ACE抑制剂/ARB以及降脂药物治疗以进行二级预防,但这种基于证据的药物治疗未得到充分利用。奥地利布尔根兰州开展了一项质量改进项目,以强调AMI患者出院时心血管药物治疗的重要性。在这项前瞻性队列研究中,利用布尔根兰州地区健康保险公司(Burgenländische Gebietskrankenkasse,BGKK)的数据库,确定了2003年期间患有AMI的250名BGKK成员。确定了所有纳入患者的出院处方和药房报销数据。AMI后出院患者(n = 207)的血小板聚集抑制剂总体处方率为86%,ACE抑制剂或ARB为77%,β受体阻滞剂为72%,包括他汀类药物在内的降脂药物为68%。在平均552天的随访期内,全因死亡率为20%。最多服用2种药物的患者与服用3或4种药物的患者相比,死亡风险比(HR)为2.23(95%CI:1.19 - 4.18;p = 0.012)。这些数据表明,使用基于证据的药物治疗预防AMI患者死亡与降低风险和生存获益相关。持续的质量改进举措有助于改善AMI后的结局。

相似文献

1
Survival of patients discharged after acute myocardial infarction and evidence-based drug therapy.急性心肌梗死后出院患者的生存率及循证药物治疗
Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22(3):145-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-006-9087-9. Epub 2007 Mar 14.
2
Hospital variation in use of secondary preventive medicine after discharge for first acute myocardial infarction during 1995-2004.1995年至2004年期间,首次急性心肌梗死后出院时二级预防药物使用情况的医院差异。
Med Care. 2008 Jan;46(1):70-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181484952.
3
Pharmacological treatment after acute myocardial infarction from 2001 to 2006: a survey in Italian primary care.2001年至2006年急性心肌梗死后的药物治疗:意大利初级保健调查
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2009 Sep;10(9):714-8. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32832c6110.
4
Effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on long-term survival in patients treated with beta blockers and antiplatelet agents after acute myocardial infarction (from the MONICA/KORA Myocardial Infarction Registry).血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对急性心肌梗死后应用β受体阻滞剂和抗血小板药物患者长期生存的影响(来自 MONICA/KORA 心肌梗死注册研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 1;114(3):329-35. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.04.046. Epub 2014 May 15.
5
Suboptimal use of evidence-based medical therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry: prescription rate, predictors, and prognostic value.韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究:急性心肌梗死患者证据为基础的医学治疗的不充分应用:处方率、预测因素和预后价值。
Am Heart J. 2010 Jun;159(6):1012-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.03.009.
6
Age and sex inequalities in the prescription of evidence-based pharmacological therapy following an acute coronary syndrome in Portugal: the EURHOBOP study.葡萄牙急性冠状动脉综合征后循证药物治疗处方中的年龄和性别不平等:EURHOBOP研究
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1401-8. doi: 10.1177/2047487313494580. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
7
Effects of Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Treatment on Postdischarge Outcomes After Acute Myocardial Infarction.多不饱和脂肪酸治疗对急性心肌梗死后出院结局的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 1;117(3):340-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.050. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
8
Longitudinal persistence with secondary prevention therapies relative to patient risk after myocardial infarction.心肌梗死后二级预防治疗的纵向持续性与患者风险的关系。
Heart. 2015 May 15;101(10):800-7. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306754. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
9
Association of Patient Enrollment in Medicare Part D With Outcomes After Acute Myocardial Infarction.医疗保险D部分患者登记与急性心肌梗死后结局的关联
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Nov;8(6):567-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.001650. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
10
Discharge prescriptions following admission for acute myocardial infarction at tertiary care and community hospitals in Quebec.魁北克省三级医疗和社区医院急性心肌梗死入院后的出院处方。
Can J Cardiol. 2001 Jan;17(1):33-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequency and Impact of Cardiology Evaluation Following Perioperative Myocardial Infarction.围手术期心肌梗死后心脏评估的频率及影响
Clin Cardiol. 2025 Mar;48(3):e70120. doi: 10.1002/clc.70120.
2
Chronic polytherapy after myocardial infarction: the trade-off between hospital and community-based providers in determining adherence to medication.心肌梗死后的慢性多疗法治疗:医院和社区提供者在确定药物依从性方面的权衡。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Apr 14;21(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-01969-9.
3
Are We Optimizing the Use of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Hospitalized with Acute Myocardial Infarction?

本文引用的文献

1
High-dose atorvastatin vs usual-dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: the IDEAL study: a randomized controlled trial.高剂量阿托伐他汀与常规剂量辛伐他汀用于心肌梗死后二级预防:IDEAL研究:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2005 Nov 16;294(19):2437-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.19.2437.
2
ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction; A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of patients with acute myocardial infarction).美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者管理指南;美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组(修订1999年急性心肌梗死患者管理指南委员会)报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Aug 4;44(3):E1-E211. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.014.
3
我们是否在优化急性心肌梗死住院患者双联抗血小板治疗的应用?
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Feb;21(2):182-188. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.04.024. Epub 2019 May 2.
4
High quality process of care increases one-year survival after acute myocardial infarction (AMI): A cohort study in Italy.高质量的医疗护理可提高急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者一年后的生存率:意大利的一项队列研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0212398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212398. eCollection 2019.
5
Effect of evidence-based therapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.基于证据的心血管疾病二级预防治疗效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 18;14(1):e0210988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210988. eCollection 2019.
6
Adherence to evidence-based drug therapies after myocardial infarction: is geographic variation related to hospital of discharge or primary care providers? A cross-classified multilevel design.心肌梗死后对循证药物治疗的依从性:地区差异与出院医院或初级保健提供者有关吗?一项交叉分类多级设计。
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 4;6(4):e010926. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010926.
7
Long-term survival in patients with different combinations of evidence-based medications after incident acute myocardial infarction: results from the MONICA/KORA Myocardial Infarction Registry.急性心肌梗死后不同循证药物组合患者的长期生存情况:莫妮卡/科拉心肌梗死登记研究结果
Clin Res Cardiol. 2014 Aug;103(8):655-64. doi: 10.1007/s00392-014-0688-0. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
8
Effect of evidence-based drug therapy on long-term outcomes in patients discharged after myocardial infarction: a nested case–control study in Italy.基于证据的药物治疗对心肌梗死后出院患者长期结局的影响:意大利的一项嵌套病例对照研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Jun;22(6):649-57. doi: 10.1002/pds.3430.
9
Effect of exposure to evidence-based pharmacotherapy on outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in older adults.暴露于基于证据的药物治疗对老年急性心肌梗死后结局的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Oct;60(10):1854-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04165.x. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
10
Application of the MAT-CHDSP to assess guideline adherence and therapy goal achievement in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention.应用 MAT-CHDSP 评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后冠心病二级预防中的指南依从性和治疗目标达标情况。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;69(3):703-9. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1402-7. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
One-year outcome of patients after acute coronary syndromes (from the Canadian Acute Coronary Syndromes Registry).急性冠脉综合征患者的一年期转归(来自加拿大急性冠脉综合征注册研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Jul 1;94(1):25-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.03.024.
4
Impact of combination evidence-based medical therapy on mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes.基于证据的联合药物治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征患者死亡率的影响。
Circulation. 2004 Feb 17;109(6):745-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000112577.69066.CB.
5
Drug prescriptions after acute myocardial infarction: dosage, compliance, and persistence.急性心肌梗死后的药物处方:剂量、依从性和持续性。
Am Heart J. 2003 Mar;145(3):438-44. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2003.143.
6
Effects of losartan and captopril on mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL randomised trial. Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan.氯沙坦与卡托普利对急性心肌梗死后高危患者死亡率和发病率的影响:OPTIMAAL随机试验。心肌梗死应用血管紧张素II拮抗剂氯沙坦的优化试验
Lancet. 2002 Sep 7;360(9335):752-60. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09895-1.
7
Baseline characteristics, management practices, and in-hospital outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE).全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究(GRACE)中急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者的基线特征、管理措施及院内结局
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Aug 15;90(4):358-63. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02489-x.
8
A prospective survey of the characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Europe and the Mediterranean basin; the Euro Heart Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes (Euro Heart Survey ACS).欧洲和地中海地区急性冠脉综合征患者的特征、治疗及预后的前瞻性调查;欧洲急性冠脉综合征心脏调查(欧洲心脏调查急性冠脉综合征)
Eur Heart J. 2002 Aug;23(15):1190-201. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2002.3193.
9
Coronary heart disease trends in four United States communities. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study 1987-1996.美国四个社区的冠心病发病趋势。社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究,1987 - 1996年。
Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;30 Suppl 1:S17-22. doi: 10.1093/ije/30.suppl_1.s17.
10
Trends in acute coronary heart disease mortality, morbidity, and medical care from 1985 through 1997: the Minnesota heart survey.1985年至1997年急性冠心病死亡率、发病率及医疗护理趋势:明尼苏达心脏调查
Circulation. 2001 Jul 3;104(1):19-24. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.104.1.19.