Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Am Heart J. 2010 Jun;159(6):1012-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.03.009.
Only limited data are available for the recent trend of optimal evidence-based medical therapy at discharge after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Asia. We evaluated the predictors for the use of optimal evidence-based medical therapy at discharge and the association between discharge medications and 6-month mortality after AMI.
Between November 2005 and January 2008, we evaluated the discharge medications among 9,294 post-MI survivors who did not have any documented contraindications to antiplatelet drugs, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), or statins in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry. Optimal evidence-based medical therapy was defined as the use of all 4 indicated medications.
Of these patients, 4,684 (50.4%) received all 4 medications at discharge. The discharge prescription rates of antiplatelet drugs, beta-blockers, ACE-Is/ARBs, and statins were 99.0%, 72.7%, 81.5%, and 77.2%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, advanced age, lower systolic blood pressure, higher Killip class at admission, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, higher blood creatinine level, lower total cholesterol levels, and coronary artery bypass grafting during hospitalization were independently associated with less use of optimal evidence-based medical therapy. In contrast, patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were more likely to use optimal medications. In Cox proportional hazards model, optimal evidence-based medical therapy was an independent predictor of 6-month mortality after adjusting clinical characteristics and angiographic and procedural data.
The optimal evidence-based medical therapy is prescribed at suboptimal rates, particularly in patients with high-risk features. New educational strategies are needed to increase the use of these secondary preventive medical therapies.
关于急性心肌梗死(AMI)后近期采用最佳循证医学治疗的趋势,亚洲地区仅有有限的数据。我们评估了出院时采用最佳循证医学治疗的预测因素,以及出院时药物治疗与 AMI 后 6 个月死亡率之间的关系。
在 2005 年 11 月至 2008 年 1 月期间,我们评估了韩国急性心肌梗死登记处中未发现抗血小板药物、β受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)/血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(ARB)或他汀类药物有任何明确禁忌证的 9294 例 AMI 后幸存者的出院药物治疗情况。最佳循证医学治疗定义为使用所有 4 种推荐药物。
这些患者中,4684 例(50.4%)在出院时接受了所有 4 种药物。出院时抗血小板药物、β受体阻滞剂、ACEI/ARB 和他汀类药物的处方率分别为 99.0%、72.7%、81.5%和 77.2%。多变量分析显示,年龄较大、收缩压较低、入院时 Killip 分级较高、左心室收缩功能障碍、血肌酐水平较高、总胆固醇水平较低以及住院期间进行冠状动脉旁路移植术与较少使用最佳循证医学治疗独立相关。相反,行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者更有可能使用最佳药物。在 Cox 比例风险模型中,在调整临床特征和血管造影及程序数据后,最佳循证医学治疗是 6 个月死亡率的独立预测因素。
最佳循证医学治疗的应用率不理想,特别是在高危特征患者中。需要采取新的教育策略来增加这些二级预防药物的应用。