Jeevanandam V, Barr M L, Auteri J S, Sanchez J A, Fong J, Schenkel F A, Marboe C C, Michler R E, Smith C R, Rose E A
Department of Surgery, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY 10032.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992 Feb;103(2):194-8; discussion 198-9.
We have previously shown the safety and efficacy of University of Wisconsin solution for hypothermic preservation of the human donor heart in a pilot group of 16 transplant recipients. The present study is a randomized clinical trial comparing University of Wisconsin solution to conventional preservation using crystalloid cardioplegia and saline storage within a 4-hour limit of ischemia. Heart transplant recipients (n = 42) were randomized into two groups: those receiving hearts preserved by University of Wisconsin solution, the UWS group (n = 22), and those receiving hearts preserved in the conventional manner, the CCS group (n = 20). Recipient age, gender, heart disease, and preoperative inotropic support and donor age, gender, and mean ischemic time in hours (UWS 2 hours 36 minutes, range 1 hour 36 minutes to 2 hours 53 minutes; CCS 2 hours 20 minutes, range 1 hour 20 minutes to 2 hours 44 minutes; p = not significant) were similar. Significant differences observed between the two groups included (1) mean time (minutes) from reperfusion to achieve a stable rhythm, (2) need for intraoperative defibrillations, (3) need for transient cardiac pacing, and (4) integrated postoperative creatinine kinase and aspartate aminotransferase release over 48 hours. There was no difference in postoperative electrocardiogram, endomyocardial biopsy, or hemodynamics. One UWS patient died of sepsis and another of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm. UWS is safe for donor organ arrest and preservation despite high viscosity and potassium concentration. When compared with CCS hearts, hearts preserved in UWS regained electrical activity more rapidly and had better myocardial protection as demonstrated by enzymatic analysis. Further investigation is required to determine the effects of UWS preservation on long-term survival, to determine the prevalence of rejection and graft atherosclerosis, and to test the ability of UWS to extend donor ischemic time in human cardiac transplantation.
我们之前在16例心脏移植受者的试验组中证明了威斯康星大学溶液用于低温保存人类供体心脏的安全性和有效性。本研究是一项随机临床试验,在4小时缺血时限内,将威斯康星大学溶液与使用晶体心脏停搏液和生理盐水保存的传统方法进行比较。心脏移植受者(n = 42)被随机分为两组:接受威斯康星大学溶液保存心脏的UWS组(n = 22)和接受传统方式保存心脏的CCS组(n = 20)。受者的年龄、性别、心脏病情况、术前正性肌力支持情况以及供者的年龄、性别和平均缺血时间(UWS组为2小时36分钟,范围为1小时36分钟至2小时53分钟;CCS组为2小时20分钟,范围为1小时20分钟至2小时44分钟;p = 无显著差异)相似。两组间观察到的显著差异包括:(1)从再灌注到达到稳定心律的平均时间(分钟);(2)术中除颤的需求;(3)临时心脏起搏的需求;(4)术后48小时内肌酸激酶和天冬氨酸转氨酶的综合释放量。术后心电图、心内膜活检或血流动力学方面无差异。一名UWS患者死于败血症,另一名死于脑动脉瘤破裂。尽管威斯康星大学溶液具有高粘度和高钾浓度,但对供体器官停搏和保存是安全的。与CCS组心脏相比,用威斯康星大学溶液保存的心脏恢复电活动更快,酶分析表明其具有更好的心肌保护作用。需要进一步研究以确定威斯康星大学溶液保存对长期生存的影响,确定排斥反应和移植物动脉粥样硬化的发生率,并测试威斯康星大学溶液在人类心脏移植中延长供体缺血时间的能力。