Suppr超能文献

威斯康星大学保存液对临床心脏移植的影响。与斯坦福保存液用于延长保存的比较。

Impact of University of Wisconsin solution on clinical heart transplantation. A comparison with Stanford solution for extended preservation.

作者信息

Stringham J C, Love R B, Welter D, Canver C C, Mentzer R M

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, USA.

出版信息

Circulation. 1998 Nov 10;98(19 Suppl):II157-61; discussion II162.

PMID:9852898
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The University of Wisconsin Solution (UW) has extended preservation of abdominal organs but has not allowed equally extended preservation of the heart. Therefore, the impact of UW on clinical heart transplantation has remained unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between June 1986 and March 1994, 161 orthotopic heart transplants were performed at our center. Of these, 66 were preserved for > or = 3 hours. Of these, 17 hearts were preserved with Stanford solution (STNF), which was used before 1990, and 49 were preserved with UW. These groups were compared for indexes of ischemic injury, ventricular function, and survival. The UW group contained more status-1 recipients (57% versus 29%, P < 0.05) and a higher mean donor age (30.7 versus 22.1 years, P = 0.008). Mean ischemic time was slightly but not significantly higher with UW (228 versus 205 minutes for UW versus STNF, respectively; P = 0.085). The time to wean from bypass after cross-clamp removal was nearly twice as long with STNF than with UW (80.6 versus 44.3 minutes, P < 0.001). There was no difference in the incidence of primary graft failure (2% for UW versus 6% for STNF, P = 0.43). The average need for inotropic support over the first 8 posttransplant hours was significantly higher with STNF than UW. Neither hospital stay nor survival differed. Nevertheless, the ability to use donor organs from more distant sites was increased. Of all hearts preserved with STNF, 26% were stored for > or = 3 hours, whereas 51% of all hearts preserved in UW were stored for this length of time. Donor use of hearts increased from 20% in 1989 to 63% in 1993, largely because of greater use of more distant donors.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that heart preservation with UW limits ischemic damage from prolonged storage and improves myocardial function in the early posttransplant period, thus allowing greater use of available donors from distant sites to patients awaiting heart transplantation.

摘要

背景

威斯康星大学溶液(UW)已延长了腹部器官的保存时间,但尚未实现对心脏的同等延长保存。因此,UW对临床心脏移植的影响仍不明确。

方法与结果

1986年6月至1994年3月期间,我们中心进行了161例原位心脏移植。其中,66例保存时间≥3小时。其中,17例心脏用斯坦福溶液(STNF)保存(1990年前使用),49例用UW保存。比较这些组的缺血损伤指标、心室功能和生存率。UW组中状态1受体更多(57%对29%,P<0.05),供体平均年龄更高(30.7岁对22.1岁,P = 0.008)。UW组的平均缺血时间略长,但差异不显著(UW组与STNF组分别为228分钟和205分钟;P = 0.085)。移除交叉夹后脱离体外循环的时间,STNF组几乎是UW组的两倍(80.6分钟对44.3分钟,P<0.001)。原发性移植物功能衰竭的发生率无差异(UW组为2%,STNF组为6%,P = 0.43)。移植后最初8小时内对正性肌力支持的平均需求,STNF组显著高于UW组。住院时间和生存率均无差异。然而,使用来自更远距离供体器官的能力有所提高。所有用STNF保存的心脏中,26%保存时间≥3小时,而所有用UW保存的心脏中有51%保存了该时长。供体心脏的使用率从1989年的20%增至1993年的63%,这主要是因为更多地使用了距离更远的供体。

结论

我们得出结论,用UW保存心脏可限制长时间保存导致的缺血损伤,并改善移植后早期的心肌功能,从而使等待心脏移植的患者能够更多地使用来自远处的可用供体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验