• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成功的磺脲类药物治疗继发性失效的当代分析

Contemporary analysis of secondary failure of successful sulfonylurea therapy.

作者信息

Nichols Gregory A, Alexander Charles M, Girman Cynthia J, Kamal-Bahl Sachin J, Brown Jonathan B

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon 97227-1098, USA.

出版信息

Endocr Pract. 2007 Jan-Feb;13(1):37-44. doi: 10.4158/EP.13.1.37.

DOI:10.4158/EP.13.1.37
PMID:17360299
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To revise older estimates of secondary failure that may no longer describe the contemporary pattern of sulfonylurea (SU) monotherapy and to identify predictors of such failure.

METHODS

We identified 4,091 patients who achieved hemoglobin A1c (A1C) <8% within 1 year after initiation of SU therapy as their first-ever antihyperglycemic drug after January 1, 1996. The study subjects underwent follow-up until they added or switched antihyperglycemic medication, had A1C > or =8%, or terminated health plan membership or until December 31, 2004. We defined secondary failure by using two separate but overlapping approaches: (1) the addition of or switch to another antihyperglycemic drug after 6 months of SU therapy or (2) the first A1C measurement > or =8.0%.

RESULTS

The level of A1C achieved within 1 year after initiation of SU treatment was the most powerful predictor of secondary SU failure. About 50% of patients whose best A1C was 7.0% to 7.9% added or switched antihyperglycemic drugs within 40 months, whereas it took nearly 60 months for those in the 6.0% to 6.9% A1C category and 74 months in the A1C <6.0% category to reach a 50% failure rate. Similarly, more than half of those patients whose best A1C was 7.0% to 7.9% had an A1C value > or =8% within 24 months, whereas it took nearly 60 months for study subjects in the 6.0% to 6.9% A1C category and 86 months for those in the <6.0% category to have SU failure. Younger age and weight gain were also predictive of failure.

CONCLUSION

Secondary failure of SU therapy is inversely associated with the level of A1C achieved within the first year of SU monotherapy. Clinicians should quickly consider therapeutic adjustments to lower the A1C level rapidly if initial success is not achieved.

摘要

目的

修正可能不再适用于描述当代磺脲类药物(SU)单药治疗模式的继发性失效的既往估计,并确定此类失效的预测因素。

方法

我们纳入了4091例患者,这些患者在1996年1月1日之后开始使用SU治疗作为其首个降糖药物,且在1年内糖化血红蛋白(A1C)<8%。研究对象接受随访,直至他们添加或更换降糖药物、A1C≥8%、终止健康计划成员资格或至2004年12月31日。我们采用两种独立但重叠的方法定义继发性失效:(1)SU治疗6个月后添加或更换另一种降糖药物;(2)首次A1C测量值≥8.0%。

结果

SU治疗开始后1年内达到的A1C水平是SU继发性失效最有力的预测因素。最佳A1C为7.0%至7.9%的患者中,约50%在40个月内添加或更换了降糖药物,而A1C在6.0%至6.9%的患者达到50%失效率需要近60个月,A1C<6.0%的患者则需要74个月。同样,最佳A1C为7.0%至7.9%的患者中,超过一半在24个月内A1C值≥8%,而A1C在6.0%至6.9%的研究对象达到SU失效需要近60个月,<6.0%的患者则需要86个月。年龄较小和体重增加也是失效的预测因素。

结论

SU治疗的继发性失效与SU单药治疗第一年达到的A1C水平呈负相关。如果未取得初始成功,临床医生应迅速考虑进行治疗调整以快速降低A1C水平。

相似文献

1
Contemporary analysis of secondary failure of successful sulfonylurea therapy.成功的磺脲类药物治疗继发性失效的当代分析
Endocr Pract. 2007 Jan-Feb;13(1):37-44. doi: 10.4158/EP.13.1.37.
2
Treatment escalation and rise in HbA1c following successful initial metformin therapy.初始二甲双胍治疗成功后治疗方案的升级及糖化血红蛋白水平的升高。
Diabetes Care. 2006 Mar;29(3):504-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.29.03.06.dc05-1937.
3
Glycemic control continues to deteriorate after sulfonylureas are added to metformin among patients with type 2 diabetes.在2型糖尿病患者中,在二甲双胍基础上加用磺脲类药物后血糖控制仍持续恶化。
Diabetes Care. 2005 May;28(5):995-1000. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.5.995.
4
Loss of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were receiving initial metformin, sulfonylurea, or thiazolidinedione monotherapy.接受初始二甲双胍、磺脲类药物或噻唑烷二酮单药治疗的2型糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳。
Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Aug;27(8):1102-10. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.8.1102.
5
Relationship of oral antihyperglycemic (sulfonylurea or metformin) medication adherence and hemoglobin A1c goal attainment for HMO patients enrolled in a diabetes disease management program.参与糖尿病疾病管理项目的健康维护组织(HMO)患者口服降糖药(磺脲类或二甲双胍)的服药依从性与糖化血红蛋白达标情况的关系。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2006 Jul-Aug;12(6):466-71. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.6.466.
6
Outcomes of adding second hypoglycemic drug after metformin monotherapy failure among type 2 diabetes in Hungary.匈牙利2型糖尿病患者二甲双胍单药治疗失败后加用第二种降糖药物的疗效
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Oct 31;6:88. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-88.
7
Secondary failure of glycemic control for patients adding thiazolidinedione or sulfonylurea therapy to a metformin regimen.在二甲双胍治疗方案基础上加用噻唑烷二酮类或磺脲类药物治疗的患者血糖控制继发失败。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Aug;13(8):457-63.
8
Effect of bromocriptine-QR on glycemic control in subjects with uncontrolled hyperglycemia on one or two oral anti-diabetes agents.溴隐亭 QR 对一种或两种口服抗糖尿病药物控制不佳的高血糖患者血糖控制的影响。
Endocr Pract. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):931-43. doi: 10.4158/EP12187.OR.
9
United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study 24: a 6-year, randomized, controlled trial comparing sulfonylurea, insulin, and metformin therapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes that could not be controlled with diet therapy. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group.英国前瞻性糖尿病研究24:一项为期6年的随机对照试验,比较磺脲类药物、胰岛素和二甲双胍疗法对新诊断的、饮食疗法无法控制的2型糖尿病患者的疗效。英国前瞻性糖尿病研究小组。
Ann Intern Med. 1998 Feb 1;128(3):165-75. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-3-199802010-00001.
10
Glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in seven European countries: findings from the Real-Life Effectiveness and Care Patterns of Diabetes Management (RECAP-DM) study.七个欧洲国家2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制:糖尿病管理的真实生活有效性和护理模式(RECAP-DM)研究结果
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008 Jun;10 Suppl 1:8-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00881.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical implications of prolonged hyperglycaemia before basal insulin initiation in type 2 diabetes patients: An electronic medical record database analysis.2型糖尿病患者起始基础胰岛素治疗前长期高血糖的临床意义:一项电子病历数据库分析
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2019 Mar 28;2(3):e00061. doi: 10.1002/edm2.61. eCollection 2019 Jul.
2
Provider beliefs about diabetes treatment have little impact on glycemic control of their patients with diabetes.医务人员对于糖尿病治疗的看法对其患者的血糖控制几乎没有影响。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2015 Feb 24;3(1):e000062. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2014-000062. eCollection 2015.
3
Effect of genetic polymorphisms on the development of secondary failure to sulfonylurea in egyptian patients with type 2 diabetes.
遗传多态性对埃及 2 型糖尿病患者磺脲类药物继发性失效发展的影响。
Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Aug;2(4):155-64. doi: 10.1177/2042018811415985.
4
Insulin versus an oral antidiabetic agent as add-on therapy in type 2 diabetes after failure of an oral antidiabetic regimen: a meta-analysis.口服抗糖尿病方案失败后,胰岛素与口服抗糖尿病药物作为2型糖尿病附加治疗的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Open Med. 2008;2(2):e26-38. Epub 2008 Apr 26.
5
Efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of insulin sensitizers as add-on therapy in metabolic syndrome in patients with secondary sulfonylurea failure: A comparative study.胰岛素增敏剂作为二线磺脲类药物失效的代谢综合征患者附加治疗的疗效、安全性及成本效益:一项对比研究。
J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010 Jul;1(2):82-6. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.72349.
6
Influence of comorbidities on therapeutic progression of diabetes treatment in Australian veterans: a cohort study.澳大利亚退伍军人糖尿病治疗中合并症对治疗进展的影响:一项队列研究。
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 17;5(11):e14024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014024.
7
Secondary failure of metformin monotherapy in clinical practice.二甲双胍单药治疗的临床继发失效。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):501-6. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1749. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
8
Weight change and glycemic control after diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病诊断后的体重变化与血糖控制
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Sep;23(9):1339-45. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0681-2. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
9
Delay of insulin addition to oral combination therapy despite inadequate glycemic control: delay of insulin therapy.尽管血糖控制不佳,但在口服联合治疗中延迟添加胰岛素:胰岛素治疗延迟。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Apr;22(4):453-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0139-y.