Wasser Samuel K, Mailand Celia, Booth Rebecca, Mutayoba Benezeth, Kisamo Emily, Clark Bill, Stephens Matthew
Center for Conservation Biology, Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 6;104(10):4228-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609714104. Epub 2007 Feb 26.
The illegal ivory trade recently intensified to the highest levels ever reported. Policing this trafficking has been hampered by the inability to reliably determine geographic origin of contraband ivory. Ivory can be smuggled across multiple international borders and along numerous trade routes, making poaching hotspots and potential trade routes difficult to identify. This fluidity also makes it difficult to refute a country's denial of poaching problems. We extend an innovative DNA assignment method to determine the geographic origin(s) of large elephant ivory seizures. A Voronoi tessellation method is used that utilizes genetic similarities across tusks to simultaneously infer the origin of multiple samples that could have one or more common origin(s). We show that this joint analysis performs better than sample-by-sample methods in assigning sample clusters of known origin. The joint method is then used to infer the geographic origin of the largest ivory seizure since the 1989 ivory trade ban. Wildlife authorities initially suspected that this ivory came from multiple locations across forest and savanna Africa. However, we show that the ivory was entirely from savanna elephants, most probably originating from a narrow east-to-west band of southern Africa, centered on Zambia. These findings enabled law enforcement to focus their investigation to a smaller area and fewer trade routes and led to changes within the Zambian government to improve antipoaching efforts. Such outcomes demonstrate the potential of genetic analyses to help combat the expanding wildlife trade by identifying origin(s) of large seizures of contraband ivory. Broader applications to wildlife trade are discussed.
非法象牙贸易近来愈演愈烈,达到了有记录以来的最高水平。由于无法可靠地确定违禁象牙的地理来源,打击这种非法交易受到了阻碍。象牙可以跨越多个国际边境、沿着众多贸易路线偷运,这使得偷猎热点地区和潜在贸易路线难以识别。这种流动性也使得难以反驳一个国家对其存在偷猎问题的否认。我们扩展了一种创新的DNA溯源方法,以确定大型象牙查获物的地理来源。我们使用了一种Voronoi镶嵌法,该方法利用象牙之间的遗传相似性,同时推断多个可能有一个或多个共同来源的样本的来源。我们表明,在对已知来源的样本聚类进行溯源时,这种联合分析方法比逐个样本分析方法表现更好。然后,我们使用这种联合方法来推断自1989年象牙贸易禁令以来查获的最大一批象牙的地理来源。野生动物管理部门最初怀疑这批象牙来自非洲森林和稀树草原的多个地区。然而,我们发现这批象牙完全来自稀树草原大象,很可能起源于以赞比亚为中心的非洲南部一条狭窄的东西向地带。这些发现使执法部门能够将调查重点集中在更小的区域和更少的贸易路线上,并促使赞比亚政府内部做出改变,以加强反偷猎工作。这些成果证明了基因分析在通过确定大型违禁象牙查获物的来源来帮助打击不断扩张的野生动物贸易方面的潜力。我们还讨论了其在野生动物贸易方面更广泛的应用。