Laudet Alexandre B, Magura Stephen, Vogel Howard S, Knight Edward L
The National Development and Research Institutes, Inc, NYC, NY.
Alcohol Treat Q. 2003;21(3):19-39. doi: 10.1300/J020v21n02_02.
Twelve-step groups (12SG), a useful recovery resource, are underutilized by dually-diagnosed persons. There has been little empirical research in this area. This study followed members of a dual-focus 12-step-based fellowship (N = 277) over one year to gain a greater understanding of participation in both specialized dual focus and traditional 12SG among dually-diagnosed persons, including reasons for attending, perceived benefits of and obstacles to affiliation, and predictors of affiliation. Findings indicate that dually-diagnosed persons do engage in both types of fellowships; patterns of engagement differed across fellowships, suggesting different comfort levels. Both types of fellowships were used to deal with addiction. Greater difficulty with substance use at baseline was associated with greater likelihood of attending 12SG at follow-up; the reverse was true for self-reported substance use at baseline. Findings are discussed in light of existing literature and clinical implications are suggested.
十二步团体(12SG)是一种有用的康复资源,但在双重诊断患者中未得到充分利用。该领域的实证研究很少。本研究对一个基于双重焦点的十二步团体(N = 277)的成员进行了为期一年的跟踪,以更深入地了解双重诊断患者参与专门的双重焦点团体和传统12SG的情况,包括参加的原因、加入的感知益处和障碍以及加入的预测因素。研究结果表明,双重诊断患者确实参与了这两种团体;不同团体的参与模式有所不同,表明舒适度不同。两种团体都被用于应对成瘾问题。基线时物质使用困难越大,随访时参加12SG的可能性就越大;基线时自我报告的物质使用情况则相反。根据现有文献对研究结果进行了讨论,并提出了临床意义。