Fan You-Hong, Hu Zhibin, Li Chunying, Wang Li-E, Guo Zhaozheng, Qiao Yawei, Zhang Li, Zhang Wei, Mao Li, Wei Qingyi
Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
J Proteome Res. 2007 Apr;6(4):1560-7. doi: 10.1021/pr060655k. Epub 2007 Mar 16.
DNA repair should occur after cells sense DNA damage signals and undergo cell-cycle arrest to provide sufficient time for DNA repair, and suboptimal DNA repair capacity (DRC) in peripheral lymphocytes has been suggested as a cancer susceptibility marker. Numerous studies showed a functional link between DNA damage sensing, cell-cycle checkpoint, and DNA repair. We hypothesized that in vitro cell-cycle checkpoint-related protein expression levels in stimulated lymphocytes predict DRC levels. To test this hypothesis, we performed the host-cell reactivation assay for DRC by transfecting stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes from 120 normal donors with transient expression plasmids damaged by benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE). The same cells were assessed for protein expression induction of eight cell-cycle checkpoint-related genes using the reverse-phase protein lysate microarray assay. In multivariate linear regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, blastogenic rate, and sample storage duration, the association between DRC and expression levels of cell-cycle checkpoint-related proteins induced by BPDE-adducts was statistically significant for p27, CCND1, ATM, and MDM2 (P = 0.00, 0.03, 0.03, and 0.03, respectively), borderline for p73 and p21 (P = 0.07 and 0.09, respectively), but not for p53 and p16 (P = 0.13 and 0.18, respectively). Because the relative expression levels of all these eight proteins were highly correlated, we further performed the principal component analysis and identified ATM as the most important predictor of DRC, followed by MDM2 and p27. Our results provide population-based in vitro evidence demonstrating that cell-cycle checkpoint-related proteins play essential roles in regulating DNA repair, at least in unaffected human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Further studies are warranted to investigate the role of interindividual variation in the expression levels of these proteins in cancer susceptibility.
细胞感知DNA损伤信号并经历细胞周期阻滞以提供足够时间进行DNA修复后,DNA修复才会发生,外周淋巴细胞中次优的DNA修复能力(DRC)已被认为是一种癌症易感性标志物。大量研究表明DNA损伤感知、细胞周期检查点和DNA修复之间存在功能联系。我们假设,受刺激淋巴细胞中体外细胞周期检查点相关蛋白的表达水平可预测DRC水平。为验证这一假设,我们通过用苯并[a]芘二醇环氧化物(BPDE)损伤的瞬时表达质粒转染120名正常供体的受刺激外周血淋巴细胞,进行了DRC的宿主细胞再激活试验。使用反相蛋白质裂解物微阵列分析评估相同细胞中八个细胞周期检查点相关基因的蛋白质表达诱导情况。在对年龄、性别、增殖率和样本储存时间进行校正的多变量线性回归分析中,BPDE加合物诱导的DRC与细胞周期检查点相关蛋白表达水平之间的关联,对于p27、CCND1、ATM和MDM2具有统计学意义(P分别为0.00、0.03、0.03和0.03),对于p73和p21接近显著(P分别为0.07和0.09),但对于p53和p16不显著(P分别为0.13和0.18)。由于所有这八种蛋白质的相对表达水平高度相关,我们进一步进行了主成分分析,并确定ATM是DRC的最重要预测因子,其次是MDM2和p27。我们的结果提供了基于人群的体外证据,证明细胞周期检查点相关蛋白在调节DNA修复中起重要作用,至少在未受影响的人类外周血淋巴细胞中如此。有必要进一步研究这些蛋白表达水平的个体间差异在癌症易感性中的作用。