Suppr超能文献

对用于诊断肝素诱导的血小板减少症的“4T”评分及肝素/血小板第4因子特异性颗粒凝胶免疫测定法的前瞻性评估。

Prospective evaluation of the '4Ts' score and particle gel immunoassay specific to heparin/PF4 for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

作者信息

Pouplard C, Gueret P, Fouassier M, Ternisien C, Trossaert M, Régina S, Gruel Y

机构信息

Department of Hematology, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2007 Jul;5(7):1373-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02524.x. Epub 2007 Mar 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe disease that is often difficult to diagnose. A clinical scoring system, the '4Ts' score, has been proposed to estimate its probability before laboratory testing, and a particle gel immunoassay (H/PF4 PaGIA) has also been developed for rapid detection of HIT antibodies.

AIM

To evaluate the performance of both methods when HIT is suspected clinically.

METHODS

Two hundred thirteen consecutive patients were included in four centers. The probability of HIT was evaluated using the 4Ts score blind to antibody test results. HIT was confirmed only when the serotonin release assay (SRA) was positive.

RESULTS

The risk of HIT was evaluated by the 4Ts score as low (LowR), intermediate (IR) or high (HR) in 34.7%, 60.6% and 4.7% of patients, respectively. The negative predictive value (NPV) of the 4Ts score was 100%, as the SRA was negative in all LowR patients. PaGIA was negative in 176 patients without HIT (99.4%, NPV) and the negative likelihood ratio (LR-) was 0.05. PaGIA was positive in 37 patients, including 21 with HIT (positive predictive value = 56.8%), with a positive LR of 11.4. A negative PaGIA result decreased the probability of HIT in IR patients from 10.9% before assay to 0.6%, whereas a positive result did not substantially increase the likelihood for HIT.

CONCLUSION

The use of the 4Ts score with PaGIA appears to be a reliable strategy to rule out HIT.

摘要

背景

肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)是一种严重疾病,通常难以诊断。已提出一种临床评分系统“4Ts”评分,用于在实验室检测前评估其可能性,并且还开发了一种颗粒凝胶免疫测定法(H/PF4 PaGIA)用于快速检测HIT抗体。

目的

评估在临床怀疑有HIT时这两种方法的性能。

方法

四个中心纳入了213例连续患者。在对抗体检测结果不知情的情况下,使用“4Ts”评分评估HIT的可能性。仅当血清素释放试验(SRA)呈阳性时才确诊为HIT。

结果

通过“4Ts”评分评估,HIT风险在患者中分别为低风险(LowR)、中度风险(IR)或高风险(HR)的比例为34.7%、60.6%和4.7%。“4Ts”评分的阴性预测值(NPV)为100%,因为所有LowR患者的SRA均为阴性。在176例无HIT的患者中,PaGIA为阴性(99.4%,NPV),阴性似然比(LR-)为0.05。37例患者的PaGIA为阳性,其中21例患有HIT(阳性预测值 = 56.8%),阳性似然比为11.4。PaGIA结果为阴性使IR患者中HIT的可能性从检测前的10.9%降至0.6%,而阳性结果并未大幅增加HIT的可能性。

结论

将“4Ts”评分与PaGIA结合使用似乎是排除HIT的可靠策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验