Kiviniemi Antti M, Tulppo Mikko P, Wichterle Dan, Hautala Arto J, Tiinanen Suvi, Seppänen Tapio, Mäkikallio Timo H, Huikuri Heikki V
Merikoski Rehabilitation and Research Centre, Oulu, Finland.
Ann Med. 2007;39(1):54-62. doi: 10.1080/07853890600990375.
Various indexes of 24-hour heart rate variability (HRV) have been able to predict all-cause mortality after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but their value in predicting specific modes of cardiac death has been limited.
The aim of this study was to assess the role of two novel spectral indexes of HRV as predictors of either sudden (SCD) or non-sudden cardiac death after an AMI. Method. We used two novel methods of spectral analysis of HRV: 1) the high-frequency (HF) spectral component, V(index), calculated as an average HF power from the most linear portion of HF power versus the R-R interval regression curve, and 2) the prevalent low-frequency oscillation of heart rate (PLF). V(index), conventional HRV measures, and PLF were analyzed from 24-hour Holter recordings of 590 patients with a recent AMI.
During the mean follow-up of 39+/-14 months, SCD occurred in 3% (n = 17) and non-sudden cardiac death in 5% (n = 28) of the patients. In univariate analysis, V(index) was the most potent predictor of SCD (RR: 6.0, 95% CI: 1.7-20.7, P<0.01), also remaining the most powerful predictor of SCD after adjustment for clinical variables and ejection fraction (RR: 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2-15.2, P<0.05). PLF was a potent predictor of non-sudden cardiac death (RR: 13.9, 95% CI: 5.9-32.5, P<0.001), but it did not predict SCD.
Novel spectral HRV analysis methods, V(index) and PLF, provide significant information of the risk of the specific mode of death after an AMI.
24小时心率变异性(HRV)的各项指标已能够预测急性心肌梗死(AMI)后的全因死亡率,但其在预测心脏性死亡的特定模式方面价值有限。
本研究旨在评估两种新的HRV频谱指标作为AMI后猝死(SCD)或非猝死性心脏死亡预测指标的作用。方法。我们采用了两种新的HRV频谱分析方法:1)高频(HF)频谱成分V(指数),计算方法为HF功率与R-R间期回归曲线最线性部分的平均HF功率;2)心率的主要低频振荡(PLF)。对590例近期发生AMI的患者进行24小时动态心电图记录,分析V(指数)、传统HRV指标和PLF。
在平均39±14个月的随访期间,3%(n = 17)的患者发生SCD,5%(n = 28)的患者发生非猝死性心脏死亡。在单因素分析中,V(指数)是SCD最强有力的预测指标(相对风险:6.0,95%可信区间:1.7 - 20.7,P<0.01),在调整临床变量和射血分数后仍是SCD最有力的预测指标(相对风险:4.2,95%可信区间:1.2 - 15.2,P<0.05)。PLF是非猝死性心脏死亡的有力预测指标(相对风险:13.9,95%可信区间:5.9 - 32.5,P<0.001),但不能预测SCD。
新的HRV频谱分析方法V(指数)和PLF为AMI后特定死亡模式的风险提供了重要信息。