Differing vulnerabilities: the moral significance of Lockean personhood.
作者信息
Blackford Russell
机构信息
School of Philosophy and Bioethics,Monash University, VIC 3206, Australia.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jan;7(1):70-1; discussion W1-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160601064348.
PMID:17366177
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Differing vulnerabilities: the moral significance of Lockean personhood.
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jan;7(1):70-1; discussion W1-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160601064348.
2
Personhood and neuroscience: naturalizing or nihilating?
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jan;7(1):37-48. doi: 10.1080/15265160601064199.
3
Is personhood an illusion?
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jan;7(1):62-3; discussion W1-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160601064298.
4
Response to open peer commentaries on "Human dignity and transhumanism: do anthro-technological devices have moral status?".
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jul;10(7):W6-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.497388.
5
A transcendental argument for the concept of personhood in neuroscience.
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jan;7(1):72-3; discussion W1-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160601064355.
6
Illusions about persons.
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jan;7(1):65-6; discussion W1-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160601064314.
7
Human dignity and transhumanism: do anthro-technological devices have moral status?
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jul;10(7):45-52. doi: 10.1080/15265161003728795.
8
A Thomistic appraisal of human enhancement technologies.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2014 Aug;35(4):289-310. doi: 10.1007/s11017-014-9300-x.
9
10
The role of suffering and community in clinical ethics.
J Clin Ethics. 1991 Summer;2(2):83-9; discussion 90-107.
Zotero 插件