• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格与神经科学:自然化还是虚无化?

Personhood and neuroscience: naturalizing or nihilating?

作者信息

Farah Martha J, Heberlein Andrea S

机构信息

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jan;7(1):37-48. doi: 10.1080/15265160601064199.

DOI:10.1080/15265160601064199
PMID:17366164
Abstract

Personhood is a foundational concept in ethics, yet defining criteria have been elusive. In this article we summarize attempts to define personhood in psychological and neurological terms and conclude that none manage to be both specific and non-arbitrary. We propose that this is because the concept does not correspond to any real category of objects in the world. Rather, it is the product of an evolved brain system that develops innately and projects itself automatically and irrepressibly onto the world whenever triggered by stimulus features such as a human-like face, body, or contingent patterns of behavior. We review the evidence for the existence of an autonomous person network in the brain and discuss its implications for the field of ethics and for the implicit morality of everyday behavior.

摘要

人格是伦理学中的一个基础概念,但定义标准却难以捉摸。在本文中,我们总结了从心理学和神经学角度定义人格的尝试,并得出结论:没有一种尝试能够做到既具体又不武断。我们认为,这是因为该概念并不对应于世界上任何真实的对象类别。相反,它是一个进化的大脑系统的产物,该系统天生发育,并在诸如类人面孔、身体或偶然行为模式等刺激特征触发时,自动且不可抑制地投射到世界上。我们回顾了大脑中存在自主人格网络的证据,并讨论了其对伦理学领域以及日常行为隐性道德的影响。

相似文献

1
Personhood and neuroscience: naturalizing or nihilating?人格与神经科学:自然化还是虚无化?
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jan;7(1):37-48. doi: 10.1080/15265160601064199.
2
Differing vulnerabilities: the moral significance of Lockean personhood.不同的脆弱性:洛克式人格的道德意义
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jan;7(1):70-1; discussion W1-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160601064348.
3
Neuroscience and metaphysics (redux).神经科学与形而上学(再探讨)
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jan;7(1):58-60; discussion W1-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160601064272.
4
The role of suffering and community in clinical ethics.痛苦与社群在临床伦理学中的作用。
J Clin Ethics. 1991 Summer;2(2):83-9; discussion 90-107.
5
Response to open peer commentaries on "Human dignity and transhumanism: do anthro-technological devices have moral status?".对关于“人类尊严与超人类主义:人类技术装置是否具有道德地位?”的公开同行评论的回应。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jul;10(7):W6-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.497388.
6
The search for the new pineal gland. Brain life and personhood.寻找新的松果体。脑生命与人格。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1992 May-Jun;22(3):30-7.
7
Abortion, metaphysics and morality: a review of Francis Beckwith's defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice.堕胎、形而上学与道德:评弗朗西斯·贝克威斯的《捍卫生命:反对堕胎选择的道德与法律依据》
J Med Philos. 2011 Jun;36(3):261-73. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhr015. Epub 2011 May 19.
8
Personhood in the bioethics literature.生物伦理学文献中的人格问题。
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1983 Winter;61(1):35-57.
9
A transcendental argument for the concept of personhood in neuroscience.神经科学中关于人格概念的先验论证。
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jan;7(1):72-3; discussion W1-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160601064355.
10
Human dignity and transhumanism: do anthro-technological devices have moral status?人类尊严与超人类主义:类人技术设备是否具有道德地位?
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jul;10(7):45-52. doi: 10.1080/15265161003728795.

引用本文的文献

1
From living well to dying well with dementia: The significance of an expanded understanding of loss for end-of-life care.从与痴呆症相伴的美好生活到善终:拓展对丧失的理解对临终关怀的意义。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 Sep 1;19:26323524251347653. doi: 10.1177/26323524251347653. eCollection 2025.
2
The Relational Care Framework: Promoting Continuity or Maintenance of Selfhood in Person-Centered Care.关系型照护框架:在以患者为中心的照护中促进连续性或自我认同的维持。
J Med Philos. 2024 Jan 13;49(1):85-101. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhad044.
3
Advocating for neurodata privacy and neurotechnology regulation.
倡导神经数据隐私和神经技术监管。
Nat Protoc. 2023 Oct;18(10):2869-2875. doi: 10.1038/s41596-023-00873-0. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
4
Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies.神经技术负责任开发与应用的建议。
Neuroethics. 2021;14(3):365-386. doi: 10.1007/s12152-021-09468-6. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
5
Charlie Gard and the weight of parental rights to seek experimental treatment.查理·加德和父母寻求实验性治疗的权利的重量。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Jul;44(7):448-452. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104718. Epub 2018 May 17.
6
Personhood status of the human zygote, embryo, fetus.人类受精卵、胚胎、胎儿的人格地位。
Linacre Q. 2017 May;84(2):130-144. doi: 10.1080/00243639.2017.1299896. Epub 2017 May 31.
7
Distancing sedation in end-of-life care from physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.在临终关怀中,将深度镇静与医生协助自杀及安乐死区分开来。
Singapore Med J. 2016 May;57(5):220-7. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016086.
8
Interrogating personhood and dementia.审视人格与痴呆症
Aging Ment Health. 2016 Aug;20(8):773-80. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1118012. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
9
Medicine and Mind-Body Dualism: A Reply to Mehta's Critique.医学与身心二元论:对梅塔批评的回应
Mens Sana Monogr. 2014 Jan;12(1):104-26. doi: 10.4103/0973-1229.130318.
10
Who Sees Human? The Stability and Importance of Individual Differences in Anthropomorphism.谁能洞察人性?拟人化中个体差异的稳定性与重要性。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 May;5(3):219-32. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369336.