Harris Lauren R, Churchward Matthew A, Butt R Hussain, Coorssen Jens R
Department of Physiology & Biophysics, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada.
J Proteome Res. 2007 Apr;6(4):1418-25. doi: 10.1021/pr0700246. Epub 2007 Mar 17.
Proteomic analyses using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE) depend heavily upon the quality of protein stains for sensitive detection. Indeed, detection rather than protein resolution is likely a current limiting factor in 2DE. The recent development of fluorescent protein stains has dramatically improved the sensitivity of in-gel protein detection and has enabled more accurate protein quantification. Here, we have evaluated the overall quality and relative cost of five commercially available fluorescent stains, Krypton, Deep Purple, Rubeo, Flamingo, and the most commonly used stain, Sypro Ruby (SR). All stains were found to be statistically comparable with regard to number of protein spots detected, but SR was superior with regard to fluorophore stability (e.g., capacity for repeated use of the stain solution). Notably, colloidal Coomassie Blue was also found to be comparable to SR when detected using an infrared fluorescence imaging system rather than standard densitometry. Thus, depending on available equipment and operating budgets, there are at least two high-sensitivity alternatives to achieve the best currently available in-gel protein detection: Sypro Ruby or Coomassie Blue.
使用二维凝胶电泳(2DE)进行蛋白质组学分析在很大程度上依赖于蛋白质染色的质量,以便进行灵敏检测。事实上,在2DE中,检测而非蛋白质分离可能是当前的一个限制因素。荧光蛋白质染色技术的最新发展极大地提高了凝胶内蛋白质检测的灵敏度,并实现了更准确的蛋白质定量。在此,我们评估了五种市售荧光染料(氪、深紫、鲁比奥、火烈鸟)以及最常用的染料Sypro Ruby(SR)的整体质量和相对成本。所有染料在检测到的蛋白质斑点数量方面经统计具有可比性,但SR在荧光团稳定性方面更具优势(例如,染色溶液重复使用的能力)。值得注意的是,当使用红外荧光成像系统而非标准光密度测定法进行检测时,胶体考马斯亮蓝也被发现与SR具有可比性。因此,根据现有设备和运营预算,至少有两种高灵敏度的替代方法可实现目前最佳的凝胶内蛋白质检测:Sypro Ruby或考马斯亮蓝。