Ramos-Jorge Maria Letícia, Bosco Vera Lúcia, Peres Marco Aurélio, Nunes Ana Cristina Gerent Petry
Department of Pediatric Dentistry,Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Dent Traumatol. 2007 Apr;23(2):114-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2005.00409.x.
The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of treatment for Enamel-Dentin Fracture (EDF) on the daily activities of adolescents. This was a case-control study (1:4). The case group was composed of 40 adolescents from 11 to 17 years of age, presenting definitive restoration treatment for EDF for over 6 months. The control group was made up of 160 adolescents with no history of dental trauma and belonging to the circle of friends of the participants of the case group, matched by gender, age, and socioeconomic level. The outcome variable 'impact' was assessed through the Oral Impact on Daily Performances (OIDP). The independent variables were collected for being of interest to the study (dental trauma) or for acting as potential confounding factors (malocclusion, decay, and mother's education). Descriptive, univariate, simple and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed. Among the cases, the impact prevalence was 40.0%, whereas among the controls it was 16.9%. The more affected daily activities were showing the teeth (18.0%), eating (6.5%), speaking (2.0%), and cleaning the mouth (0.5%). The odds ratio of adolescents treated for EDF of presenting an impact on daily activities was 3.3 times (confidence interval 95%: 1.4-7.7) greater than among adolescents without dental trauma, controlling for mother's education, decay and the presence of malocclusion. Adolescents whose teeth have been esthetically treated for EDFs run a greater risk of presenting OIDP when compared to adolescents that have never suffered dental injuries.
本研究的目的是调查牙釉质-牙本质骨折(EDF)治疗对青少年日常活动的影响。这是一项病例对照研究(1:4)。病例组由40名11至17岁的青少年组成,他们接受EDF的确定性修复治疗超过6个月。对照组由160名无牙外伤史的青少年组成,他们是病例组参与者的朋友圈成员,按性别、年龄和社会经济水平匹配。通过日常表现的口腔影响(OIDP)评估结果变量“影响”。收集自变量是因为它们与研究相关(牙外伤)或作为潜在的混杂因素(错牙合、龋齿和母亲的教育程度)。进行了描述性、单变量、简单和多元逻辑回归分析。在病例组中,影响患病率为40.0%,而在对照组中为16.9%。受影响较大的日常活动包括展示牙齿(18.0%)、进食(6.5%)、说话(2.0%)和清洁口腔(0.5%)。在控制了母亲的教育程度、龋齿和错牙合的情况下,接受EDF治疗的青少年对日常活动产生影响的比值比是未受过牙外伤的青少年的3.3倍(95%置信区间:1.4 - 7.7)。与从未遭受牙外伤的青少年相比,因EDF接受美学治疗的青少年出现OIDP的风险更大。