Leggat Peter A, Mills Deborah, Speare Richard
Anton Breinl Centre for Public Health and Tropical Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
J Travel Med. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):112-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2007.00113.x.
Little is known about the level of concern and sources of information of hostelers concerning personal safety and terrorism. This study was designed to investigate these in the Australian context.
In 2006, self-administered questionnaires were distributed to hostelers attending a travelers' information evening in Brisbane.
Forty questionnaires (60.8%) were returned. Over two thirds of attendees were women (71.4%). About two thirds of the hostelers attending the travelers' information evening reported being aged 29 years or younger (64.2%). Anticipated main destinations were Europe (68.3%), Asia (14.3%), and North America (11.9%). Nearly two thirds (63.4%) intended to travel in more than 8 weeks time or were not sure. Of those departing within 8 weeks, only 40% had sought travel health advice from their general practitioner and/or travel clinic. Nonmedical sources of information on travel health included travel books and guides (40.5%), Internet (35.7%), and travel agents (19.0%). On a five-point rating scale (1 being not concerned to 5 being extremely concerned), median ratings of hostelers' concern for personal safety (4.0) was significantly higher than for terrorism (2.5), with the range being 1 to 5 in each case (p < 0.001). Nearly three quarters (73.8%) of hostelers would seek personal safety advice from multiple sources, and sources of information included the Internet (69.0%, 29), travel books and guides (59.5%), physicians (57.1%), and travel agents (45.2%). Only three (7.1%) nominated the physician as their only source of personal safety advice.
Hostelers attending a travelers' information night in Australia expressed more concern for their personal safety when traveling than for terrorism. Since this group of travelers uses multiple sources of information with the Internet most commonly used, Web sites that provide accurate and relevant information in an acceptable format could play an important role in supporting this group. It is important that policies being promoted by travel health advocacy groups in Australia continue to advocate that travelers seek travel health advice from a qualified source early, preferably around 6 to 8 weeks before travel, and that personal safety be discussed as part of the travel health consultation.
关于背包客对个人安全和恐怖主义的关注程度及信息来源,人们了解甚少。本研究旨在澳大利亚背景下对此进行调查。
2006年,向参加布里斯班旅行者信息之夜活动的背包客发放了自填式问卷。
共收回40份问卷(60.8%)。超过三分之二的参与者为女性(71.4%)。参加旅行者信息之夜活动的背包客中,约三分之二报告年龄在29岁及以下(64.2%)。预期的主要目的地是欧洲(68.3%)、亚洲(14.3%)和北美洲(11.9%)。近三分之二(63.4%)的人打算在8周多以后出行或不确定出行时间。在8周内出发的人中,只有40%向他们的全科医生和/或旅行诊所寻求过旅行健康建议。旅行健康的非医学信息来源包括旅行书籍和指南(40.5%)、互联网(35.7%)和旅行社(19.0%)。在五分制评分量表(1分为不担心,5分为极其担心)上,背包客对个人安全的担忧中位数评分(4.0)显著高于对恐怖主义的担忧中位数评分(2.5),两种情况的评分范围均为1至5(p < 0.001)。近四分之三(73.8%)的背包客会从多个来源寻求个人安全建议,信息来源包括互联网(69.0%,29人)、旅行书籍和指南(59.5%)、医生(57.1%)和旅行社(45.2%)。只有三人(7.1%)将医生指定为他们唯一的个人安全建议来源。
在澳大利亚参加旅行者信息之夜活动的背包客在旅行时对个人安全的担忧多于对恐怖主义的担忧。由于这群旅行者使用多种信息来源,其中互联网使用最为普遍,以可接受的格式提供准确和相关信息的网站在支持这群人方面可以发挥重要作用。澳大利亚旅行健康倡导组织所推行的政策继续倡导旅行者尽早,最好在旅行前6至8周左右,从合格的来源寻求旅行健康建议,并将个人安全作为旅行健康咨询的一部分进行讨论,这一点很重要。