Suppr超能文献

共生HIV毒株演变为致命大流行毒株的机制与进化史:关键事件可能是1927年在刚果利奥波德维尔(金沙萨)进行的帕马喹试验。

Mechanism and history of evolution of symbiotic HIV strains into lethal pandemic strains: the key event may have been a 1927 trial of pamaquine in Leopoldville (Kinshasa), Congo.

作者信息

Parris George E

出版信息

Med Hypotheses. 2007;69(4):838-48. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2007.01.073. Epub 2007 Mar 26.

Abstract

In previous papers, I have rejected both the zoonosis and the serial transfer hypotheses of the origin and evolution of the current lethal pandemic strains of HIV. The hypothesis that fits the critical observations is that all the human and nonhuman primate species in central Africa (an area of hyper-endemic malaria) have shared (through inter-species transfers) a "primate T-cell retrovirus" (PTRV), which has adapted to each host species. This retrovirus is believed to assist primate T-cells attack the liver stage of the malaria infection. Each geographic region has a dominant primate host and a characteristic virus. Starting in 1955 and continuing into the late 1970s, chloroquine was provided by the WHO and used for prophylaxis against malaria. Chloroquine has a number of biochemical activities but two of the most important are blocking transcription of cellular genes and proviruses activated by NF-kappaB and blocking the glycosylation of surface proteins on viruses and cells. Concurrent with the development of resistance of the malaria parasite to chloroquine, HIV strains were quickly selected, which have enhanced transcription rates (by inclusion of multiple kappaB binding sites in their long terminal repeats by recombination) and enhanced infectivity (fusogenicity) (most likely by mutations in multiple viral genes that regulate glycosylation of Env). There also may have been mutations that enhanced activation of NF-kappaB in the host cell. These changes in the retrovirus genome were not manifest in effects of the HIV strains as long as the hosts were under the influence of chloroquine. But, when the virus infects people who are not protected by chloroquine, the virus multiplies more rapidly and is more communicable. Fortunately, most of these strains (i.e., HIV-2 groups, and HIV-1 O and HIV-1 N) self-regulate (i.e., infected cells kill infected cells) well enough that viral loads remain subdued and bystander cells of the immune system are not excessively attrited. In the case of HIV-1 group M, however, there is more going on. Following the work of Korber et al. on the phylogenetics of HIV-1 groups M, I reach the conclusion that the major subgroups giving rise to the worldwide pandemic, were founded in a 1927 clinical trial of pamaquine (plasmoquine) in Leopoldville (Kinshasa). This drug is much more toxic that chloroquine and appears to have strongly selected for resistance to apoptosis in infected cells, which allows these subgroups to attrite bystander cells leading to AIDS.

摘要

在之前的论文中,我驳斥了关于当前致死性艾滋病大流行毒株起源和进化的人畜共患病假说以及连续传播假说。符合关键观察结果的假说是,中非地区(疟疾高度流行地区)的所有人类和非人类灵长类物种(通过种间转移)共享了一种“灵长类T细胞逆转录病毒”(PTRV),该病毒已适应每个宿主物种。据信这种逆转录病毒有助于灵长类T细胞攻击疟疾感染的肝脏阶段。每个地理区域都有一个占主导地位的灵长类宿主和一种特征性病毒。从1955年开始并持续到20世纪70年代末,世界卫生组织提供氯喹并将其用于疟疾预防。氯喹具有多种生化活性,但其中最重要的两种是阻断由核因子κB激活的细胞基因和前病毒的转录,以及阻断病毒和细胞表面蛋白的糖基化。在疟原虫对氯喹产生耐药性的同时,HIV毒株迅速被选择出来,这些毒株具有更高的转录速率(通过重组在其长末端重复序列中包含多个κB结合位点)和更强的感染性(融合性)(很可能是通过多个调节Env糖基化的病毒基因突变)。宿主细胞中可能也存在增强核因子κB激活的突变。只要宿主受到氯喹的影响,逆转录病毒基因组的这些变化在HIV毒株的效应中就不会显现出来。但是,当病毒感染未受氯喹保护的人时,病毒繁殖得更快且更具传染性。幸运的是,大多数这些毒株(即HIV - 2组以及HIV - 1 O和HIV - 1 N)能够很好地自我调节(即受感染细胞杀死受感染细胞),以至于病毒载量保持在较低水平,免疫系统的旁观者细胞也不会过度损耗。然而,就HIV - 1 M组而言,情况更为复杂。根据科尔伯等人关于HIV - 1 M组系统发育学的研究,我得出结论,导致全球大流行的主要亚组是在1927年于利奥波德维尔(金沙萨)进行的帕马喹(疟涤平)临床试验中形成的。这种药物比氯喹毒性大得多,似乎强烈选择了受感染细胞对细胞凋亡的抗性,这使得这些亚组能够损耗旁观者细胞,从而导致艾滋病。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验