Suppr超能文献

艾滋病是一种人畜共患病?病毒起源与疫情起源的混淆。

AIDS as a zoonosis? Confusion over the origin of the virus and the origin of the epidemics.

作者信息

Marx Preston A, Apetrei Cristian, Drucker Ernest

机构信息

Tulane National Primate Research Center, Covington, LA, USA.

出版信息

J Med Primatol. 2004 Oct;33(5-6):220-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0684.2004.00078.x.

Abstract

Based on findings demonstrating the simian ancestry of HIV, AIDS has been reported to be a zoonosis. However, this theory has never been proved and must seriously be questioned. Several arguments show that HIV-AIDS is not a zoonosis. (i) If AIDS were a zoonosis, there must be evidence of AIDS being directly acquired from an animal species, as is rabies, a disease that is directly acquired from animals. (ii) Despite long-term and frequent human exposure to SIV-infected monkeys in Africa, only 11 cross-species transmission events are known, and only four of these have resulted in significant human-to-human transmission, generating HIV-1 groups M and O and HIV-2 groups A and B. The closest relatives of SIVcpz (HIV-1 group N) and of SIVsm (HIV-2 groups C-H) are extremely rare, with only six HIV-1 group N-infected patients and only single individuals known to be infected by HIV-2 groups C-H. SIV, while capable of cross-species transmission, is thus poorly adapted for disease and epidemic spread. If AIDS were a zoonosis that is capable of significant human-to-human spread, there would be a plethora of founder subtypes and groups. (iii) Human exposure to SIV is thousands of years old, but AIDS emerged only in the 20th century. If AIDS were a zoonosis that spread into the human population, it would have spread to the West during slave trade. (iv) Experimental transmission of SIVs to different species of monkeys is often well controlled by the new host, showing that the virus and not the disease is transmitted. Therefore, we conclude that cross-species transmission of SIV does not in itself constitute the basis for a zoonosis. Transmission per se is not the major requirement for the generation of the AIDS epidemic. All HIVs do derive from simian species, but AIDS does not qualify as a zoonosis and this explanation cannot in itself account for the origin of AIDS epidemic. It is important to distinguish AIDS from true zoonoses (e.g. rabies) because research is needed to understand the processes by which animal viruses cause sustained human-to-human transmission, epidemics and even pandemics. Much is known about emerging viruses, but almost nothing is known about emerging viral diseases.

摘要

基于表明艾滋病毒具有猿类起源的研究结果,艾滋病被报道为人畜共患病。然而,这一理论从未得到证实,且必须受到严重质疑。有几个论据表明艾滋病毒-艾滋病并非人畜共患病。(i)如果艾滋病是人畜共患病,那么必定有证据表明艾滋病是直接从动物物种感染而来的,就像狂犬病这种直接从动物感染的疾病一样。(ii)尽管在非洲人类长期且频繁地接触感染了猴免疫缺陷病毒(SIV)的猴子,但已知的跨物种传播事件仅有11起,其中只有4起导致了显著的人际传播,产生了HIV-1的M组和O组以及HIV-2的A组和B组。猴免疫缺陷病毒(SIVcpz,HIV-1的N组)和猴免疫缺陷病毒(SIVsm,HIV-2的C-H组)的近亲极其罕见,仅有6名感染HIV-1 N组的患者,且已知感染HIV-2 C-H组的仅有个别病例。因此,SIV虽然能够进行跨物种传播,但对疾病和流行传播的适应性很差。如果艾滋病是一种能够在人际间大量传播的人畜共患病,那么将会有大量的始祖亚型和群组。(iii)人类接触SIV已有数千年历史,但艾滋病直到20世纪才出现。如果艾滋病是一种传播到人类群体中的人畜共患病,那么在奴隶贸易时期它就会传播到西方。(iv)将SIV实验性传播给不同种类的猴子时,往往能被新宿主很好地控制,这表明传播的是病毒而非疾病。因此,我们得出结论,SIV的跨物种传播本身并不构成人畜共患病的基础。传播本身并非艾滋病流行产生的主要条件。所有的艾滋病毒确实都源自猿类物种,但艾滋病并不符合人畜共患病的定义,这种解释本身无法说明艾滋病流行的起源。将艾滋病与真正的人畜共患病(如狂犬病)区分开来很重要,因为需要开展研究以了解动物病毒引发持续人际传播、疫情甚至大流行的过程。关于新兴病毒我们了解很多,但对于新兴病毒性疾病却几乎一无所知。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验