Frank Reanne
Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2007 May;64(10):1977-83. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.01.010. Epub 2007 Mar 21.
The debate over the role of race/ethnicity in determining disease susceptibility has re-emerged since it was declared that race was arbitrary biological fiction more than 50 years ago. Partly due to advancements in the Human Genome Project and related technologies, the idea that race/ethnicity does have a genetic basis is enjoying a resurgence. A rise in the use of race in genetic studies has left many researchers who are committed to a social conceptualization of race at a loss regarding how to evaluate these developments. The commentary attempts to correct the problem by providing a critical review of the state of research on race, genetics and health. This review aims to bring social health disparities researchers up-to-date on developments in the genetic literature and to facilitate a more critical engagement of research that purports to find a genetic basis to racial disparities in health.
50多年前,种族被宣称是随意编造的生物学概念后,关于种族/族裔在决定疾病易感性方面的作用的争论再度兴起。部分由于人类基因组计划及相关技术的进步,种族/族裔具有遗传基础这一观点正在复兴。基因研究中对种族的使用增加,让许多致力于从社会层面理解种族的研究人员,对于如何评估这些进展感到困惑。这篇评论试图通过对种族、遗传学与健康的研究现状进行批判性审视来纠正这一问题。这一审视旨在让社会健康差异研究人员了解基因文献的最新进展,并促进对那些声称找到健康方面种族差异遗传基础的研究进行更具批判性的参与。