Ranganath Charan, Heller Aaron S, Wilding Edward L
Center for Neuroscience, 1544 Newton Ct., University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Neuroimage. 2007 May 1;35(4):1663-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.020. Epub 2007 Feb 3.
Although substantial evidence suggests that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) implements processes that are critical for accurate episodic memory judgments, the specific roles of different PFC subregions remain unclear. Here, we used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to distinguish between prefrontal activity related to operations that (1) influence processing of retrieval cues based on current task demands, or (2) are involved in monitoring the outputs of retrieval. Fourteen participants studied auditory words spoken by a male or female speaker and completed memory tests in which the stimuli were unstudied foil words and studied words spoken by either the same speaker at study, or the alternate speaker. On "general" test trials, participants were to determine whether each word was studied, regardless of the voice of the speaker, whereas on "specific" test trials, participants were to additionally distinguish between studied words that were spoken in the same voice or a different voice at study. Thus, on specific test trials, participants were explicitly required to attend to voice information in order to evaluate each test item. Anterior (right BA 10), dorsolateral prefrontal (right BA 46), and inferior frontal (bilateral BA 47/12) regions were more active during specific than during general trials. Activation in anterior and dorsolateral PFC was enhanced during specific test trials even in response to unstudied items, suggesting that activation in these regions was related to the differential processing of retrieval cues in the two tasks. In contrast, differences between specific and general test trials in inferior frontal regions (bilateral BA 47/12) were seen only for studied items, suggesting a role for these regions in post-retrieval monitoring processes. Results from this study are consistent with the idea that different PFC subregions implement distinct, but complementary processes that collectively support accurate episodic memory judgments.
尽管大量证据表明前额叶皮层(PFC)执行着对准确的情景记忆判断至关重要的过程,但不同PFC子区域的具体作用仍不清楚。在此,我们使用事件相关功能磁共振成像来区分与以下操作相关的前额叶活动:(1)根据当前任务需求影响检索线索的处理,或(2)参与监测检索输出。14名参与者学习了男性或女性说出的听觉单词,并完成了记忆测试,其中刺激物是未学习的陪衬词以及学习时由同一说话者或另一个说话者说出的已学习单词。在“一般”测试试验中,参与者要确定每个单词是否被学习过,而不考虑说话者的声音,而在“特定”测试试验中,参与者还要额外区分学习时用相同声音或不同声音说出的已学习单词。因此,在特定测试试验中,明确要求参与者关注声音信息以评估每个测试项目。与一般试验相比,特定试验期间,前额叶前部(右侧BA 10)、背外侧前额叶(右侧BA 46)和额下回(双侧BA 47/12)区域更为活跃。即使在对未学习项目的反应中,特定测试试验期间前额叶前部和背外侧PFC的激活也增强了,这表明这些区域的激活与两项任务中检索线索的差异处理有关。相比之下,额下回区域(双侧BA 47/12)在特定和一般测试试验之间的差异仅在已学习项目中出现,这表明这些区域在检索后监测过程中发挥作用。这项研究的结果与以下观点一致,即不同的PFC子区域执行着不同但互补的过程,这些过程共同支持准确的情景记忆判断。