Miller Eric L, Bimbo Anthony P, Barlow Stuart M, Sheridan Berni
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 OES United Kingdom.
J AOAC Int. 2007 Jan-Feb;90(1):6-20.
Ten fishmeal samples (hidden duplicates of 4 meals plus 2 high-protein meals as a Youden pair), tryptophan, and nicotinic acid were analyzed by 18 laboratories using the Dumas method. Thirteen of the laboratories also analyzed the same 12 samples using their current Kjeldahl method. Recoveries (+/-SR) of tryptophan and nicotinic acid were 99.3+/-1.04 and 98.8+/-2.11% by Dumas and 97.1+/-3.03 and 74.6+/-26.76% by Kjeldahl. The Dumas method gave significantly greater values (P < 0.001) than the Kjeldahl method. For fishmeals, Kjeldahl N = 0.989 of Dumas N (P < 0.001). A similar proportionate difference (0.984 of Dumas N) was observed with tryptophan. Most laboratories failed to determine nicotinic acid correctly by Kjeldahl. For fishmeals, the relative standard deviations for repeatability and reproducibility were for Dumas 1.48 and 2.01% and Kjeldahl 1.62 and 2.37%, respectively. A single analysis conducted in 2 laboratories should not differ by more than 5.63% of the mean value when measured by Dumas or by more than 6.64% by Kjeldahl. It is concluded that with fishmeal, Dumas gives a more reliable measure of organic nitrogen than Kjeldahl, and, therefore, Dumas should be the method of choice.
18个实验室使用杜马斯法对10个鱼粉样本(4种鱼粉的隐藏复制品加上2种高蛋白鱼粉作为尤登对)、色氨酸和烟酸进行了分析。其中13个实验室还使用其当前的凯氏定氮法对相同的12个样本进行了分析。杜马斯法测定色氨酸和烟酸的回收率(±标准偏差)分别为99.3±1.04%和98.8±2.11%,凯氏定氮法测定的回收率分别为97.1±3.03%和74.6±26.76%。杜马斯法得到的值显著高于凯氏定氮法(P<0.001)。对于鱼粉,凯氏定氮法测定的氮含量是杜马斯法测定值的0.989倍(P<0.001)。色氨酸也观察到类似的比例差异(杜马斯法测定值的0.984倍)。大多数实验室用凯氏定氮法无法正确测定烟酸。对于鱼粉,杜马斯法的重复性和再现性相对标准偏差分别为1.48%和2.01%,凯氏定氮法分别为1.62%和2.37%。当用杜马斯法测量时,2个实验室进行的单次分析结果与平均值的差异不应超过5.63%,用凯氏定氮法测量时不应超过6.64%。结论是,对于鱼粉,杜马斯法比凯氏定氮法能更可靠地测定有机氮,因此,杜马斯法应作为首选方法。