• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

噪声性听力损失个体在安静和嘈杂环境中的言语接受情况与其纯音听力图的关系。

Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.

作者信息

Smoorenburg G F

机构信息

TNO Institute for Perception, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Jan;91(1):421-37. doi: 10.1121/1.402729.

DOI:10.1121/1.402729
PMID:1737889
Abstract

Tone thresholds and speech-reception thresholds were measured in 200 individuals (400 ears) with noise-induced hearing loss. The speech-reception thresholds were measured in a quiet condition and in noise with a speech spectrum at levels of 35, 50, 65, and 80 dBA. The tone audiograms could be described by three principal components: hearing loss in the regions above 3 kHz, from 1 to 3 kHz and below 1 kHz; the speech thresholds could be described by two components: speech reception in quiet and speech reception in noise at 50-80 dBA. Hearing loss above 1 kHz was related to speech reception in noise; hearing loss at and below 1 kHz to speech reception in quiet. The correlation between the speech thresholds in quiet and in noise was only R = 0.45. An adequate predictor of the speech threshold in noise, the primary factor in the hearing handicap, was the pure-tone average at 2 and 4 kHz (PTA2,4, R = 0.72). The minimum value of the prediction error for any tone-audiometric predictor of this speech threshold was 1.2 dB (standard deviation). The prediction could not be improved by taking into account the critical ratio for low-frequency noise nor by its upward spread of masking. The prediction error is due to measurement error and to a factor common to both ears. The latter factor is ascribed to cognitive skill in speech reception. Hearing loss above 10 to 15 dB HL (hearing level) already shows an effect on the speech threshold in noise, a noticeable handicap is found at PTA2,4 = 30 dB HL.

摘要

对200名(400只耳朵)患有噪声性听力损失的个体进行了音调阈值和言语接受阈值测量。言语接受阈值在安静条件下以及在噪声环境中进行测量,噪声的言语频谱水平分别为35、50、65和80分贝声级(dBA)。音调听力图可由三个主要成分描述:3千赫兹以上、1至3千赫兹以及1千赫兹以下区域的听力损失;言语阈值可由两个成分描述:安静环境中的言语接受以及50 - 80分贝声级噪声环境中的言语接受。1千赫兹以上的听力损失与噪声环境中的言语接受相关;1千赫兹及以下的听力损失与安静环境中的言语接受相关。安静环境和噪声环境中言语阈值之间的相关性仅为R = 0.45。作为听力障碍主要因素的噪声环境中言语阈值的充分预测指标是2千赫兹和4千赫兹处的纯音平均听阈(PTA2,4,R = 0.72)。对于该言语阈值的任何音调听力测定预测指标,预测误差的最小值为1.2分贝(标准差)。考虑低频噪声的临界比率或其掩蔽的向上扩展并不能改善预测效果。预测误差是由于测量误差以及双耳共有的一个因素所致。后一个因素归因于言语接受中的认知技能。听力损失超过10至15分贝听力级(HL)已对噪声环境中的言语阈值产生影响,当PTA2,4 = 30分贝HL时会发现明显的听力障碍。

相似文献

1
Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.噪声性听力损失个体在安静和嘈杂环境中的言语接受情况与其纯音听力图的关系。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Jan;91(1):421-37. doi: 10.1121/1.402729.
2
The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.高频纯音听力损失、噪声环境下听力测试(HINT)阈值与清晰度指数之间的关系。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Nov-Dec;23(10):779-88. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.10.4.
3
Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.3430名退伍军人的噪声中言语测试临床经验:与纯音阈值及安静环境下言语识别的比较
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Jul-Aug;22(7):405-23. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.7.3.
4
On the limited transfer of information with noise-induced hearing loss.关于噪声性听力损失中信息的有限传递
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1990;469:38-46.
5
Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.使用纯音行为测听法、粤语噪声环境下听力测试(CHINT)和皮层诱发反应测听法所获得的听力阈值比较。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2008 Jun;128(6):654-60. doi: 10.1080/00016480701642189.
6
Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.基底膜非线性对纯音和言语掩蔽影响的估计。
Ear Hear. 2007 Feb;28(1):2-17. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3180310212.
7
Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.噪声中的语音识别:估计基底膜反应中压缩非线性的影响。
Ear Hear. 2007 Sep;28(5):682-93. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812f7156.
8
[Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes].[不同听力图类别在噪声中的哥廷根语句]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2012 Dec;91(12):782-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1295419. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
9
Audiovisual speech reception in noise and self-perceived hearing disability in sensorineural hearing loss.
Audiology. 1997 Jan-Feb;36(1):46-56. doi: 10.3109/00206099709071960.
10
Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.你听到那个噪音了吗?针对听力正常和听力受损受试者进行的固定噪音水平下的德语矩阵句子测试。
Int J Audiol. 2015;54 Suppl 2:71-9. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1079929. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Vestibular function tests are helpful in differentiating between Menière's disease and vestibular migraine.前庭功能测试有助于鉴别梅尼埃病和前庭性偏头痛。
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 7;16:1569247. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1569247. eCollection 2025.
2
Synchrony in auditory 40-Hz gamma oscillations increases in older age and correlates with hearing abilities and cortical GABA levels.听觉40赫兹伽马振荡的同步性在老年时增强,且与听力能力和皮质γ-氨基丁酸水平相关。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2023 Dec 8;1. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00035. eCollection 2023.
3
Auditory decision-making deficits after permanent noise-induced hearing loss.
永久性噪声性听力损失后的听觉决策缺陷。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):2104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83374-8.
4
Multidimensional relationships between sensory perception and cognitive aging.感官知觉与认知衰老之间的多维关系。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Dec 20;16:1484494. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1484494. eCollection 2024.
5
Sensitivity of Methods for Diagnosing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Cases of Exposures Including Intense Low-Frequency Noise.诊断包括高强度低频噪声暴露在内的噪声性听力损失病例的方法的灵敏度。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241240353. doi: 10.1177/23312165241240353.
6
A standardised test to evaluate audio-visual speech intelligibility in French.一项评估法语视听语音清晰度的标准化测试。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 14;10(2):e24750. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24750. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
7
Diagnosing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Sustained During Military Service Using Deep Neural Networks.使用深度神经网络诊断军事服役期间持续的噪声性听力损失。
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231184982. doi: 10.1177/23312165231184982.
8
Development of an Arabic "Command in Noise" Hearing Test to Assess Fitness for Duty.开发一种阿拉伯语“噪声下指令”听力测试,以评估履职能力。
Noise Health. 2023 Apr-Jun;25(117):104-112. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_69_22.
9
Simplified cochlear frequency selectivity measure for sensorineural hearing loss screening: comparison with digit triplet test (DTT) and shortened speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) questionnaire.用于感音神经性听力损失筛查的简化耳蜗频率选择性测量:与数字三音测试(DTT)和缩短的言语、空间和听力质量量表(SSQ)问卷的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Oct;280(10):4391-4400. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07929-7. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
10
Noise Exposure in Palestinian Workers Without a Diagnosis of Hearing Impairment: Relations to Speech-Perception-in-Noise Difficulties, Tinnitus, and Hyperacusis.巴勒斯坦无听力损伤工人的噪声暴露:与语音感知噪声困难、耳鸣和听觉过敏的关系。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Mar 7;66(3):1085-1109. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00461. Epub 2023 Feb 20.