• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于感音神经性听力损失筛查的简化耳蜗频率选择性测量:与数字三音测试(DTT)和缩短的言语、空间和听力质量量表(SSQ)问卷的比较。

Simplified cochlear frequency selectivity measure for sensorineural hearing loss screening: comparison with digit triplet test (DTT) and shortened speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) questionnaire.

机构信息

Auditory Lab, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Kulliyyah of Allied Health Sciences, International Islamic University of Malaysia, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Oct;280(10):4391-4400. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07929-7. Epub 2023 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00405-023-07929-7
Abstract

PURPOSE

Pure-tone audiometry (PTA) is the gold standard for screening and diagnosis of hearing loss but is not always accessible. This study evaluated a simplified cochlear frequency selectivity (FS) measure as an alternative option to screen for early frequency-specific sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).

METHODS

FS measures at 1 and 4 kHz center frequencies were obtained using a custom-made software in normal-hearing (NH), slight SNHL and mild-to-moderate SNHL subjects. For comparison, subjects were also assessed with the Malay Digit Triplet Test (DTT) and the shortened Malay Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Compared to DTT and SSQ, the FS measure at 4 kHz was able to distinguish NH from slight and mild-to-moderate SNHL subjects, and was strongly correlated with their thresholds in quiet determined separately in 1-dB step sizes at the similar test frequency. Further analysis with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves indicated area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77 and 0.83 for the FS measure at 4 kHz when PTA thresholds of NH subjects were taken as ≤ 15 dB HL and ≤ 20 dB HL, respectively. At the optimal FS cut-off point for 4 kHz, the FS measure had 77.8% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity to detect 20 dB HL hearing loss.

CONCLUSION

FS measure was superior to DTT and SSQ questionnaire in detecting early frequency-specific threshold shifts in SNHL subjects, particularly at 4 kHz. This method could be used for screening subjects at risk of noise-induced hearing loss.

摘要

目的

纯音测听(PTA)是筛查和诊断听力损失的金标准,但并非总是可行。本研究评估了一种简化的耳蜗频率选择性(FS)测量方法,作为筛查早期频率特异性感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)的替代选择。

方法

使用定制软件在正常听力(NH)、轻度 SNHL 和轻度至中度 SNHL 受试者中获得 1 和 4 kHz 中心频率的 FS 测量值。为了比较,还使用马来语数字三连音测试(DTT)和缩短的马来语言语、空间和听力质量量表(SSQ)问卷对受试者进行评估。

结果

与 DTT 和 SSQ 相比,4 kHz 的 FS 测量值能够区分 NH 与轻度和轻度至中度 SNHL 受试者,并且与他们在安静状态下的阈值强相关,阈值是在相似测试频率下以 1 dB 的步长单独确定的。进一步的接收器操作特性(ROC)曲线分析表明,当以 PTA 阈值为≤15 dB HL 和≤20 dB HL 分别作为 NH 受试者的阈值时,4 kHz 的 FS 测量值的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.77 和 0.83。在 4 kHz 的最佳 FS 截止点,FS 测量值对 20 dB HL 听力损失的灵敏度为 77.8%,特异性为 86.7%。

结论

FS 测量值在检测 SNHL 受试者的早期频率特异性阈值变化方面优于 DTT 和 SSQ 问卷,特别是在 4 kHz 时。这种方法可用于筛查有噪声性听力损失风险的受试者。

相似文献

1
Simplified cochlear frequency selectivity measure for sensorineural hearing loss screening: comparison with digit triplet test (DTT) and shortened speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) questionnaire.用于感音神经性听力损失筛查的简化耳蜗频率选择性测量:与数字三音测试(DTT)和缩短的言语、空间和听力质量量表(SSQ)问卷的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Oct;280(10):4391-4400. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07929-7. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
2
Validation of a French-Language Version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire, Cluster Analysis and Comparison with the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale.法语版空间听力问卷的验证、聚类分析及与言语、空间和听力质量量表的比较
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37(4):412-23. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000269.
3
Slight-mild sensorineural hearing loss in children: audiometric, clinical, and risk factor profiles.儿童轻度-轻度感音神经性听力损失:听力计、临床和危险因素特征。
Ear Hear. 2010 Apr;31(2):202-12. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c62263.
4
Efficient hearing screening in noise-exposed listeners using the digit triplet test.使用数码三音测试对噪声暴露者进行有效的听力筛查。
Ear Hear. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):773-8. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318297920b.
5
Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-In-Noise Test Using Antiphasic Stimuli.使用反相刺激提高数字噪声测试的灵敏度
Ear Hear. 2020 Mar/Apr;41(2):442-450. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000775.
6
Pure-tone audiometry without bone-conduction thresholds: using the digits-in-noise test to detect conductive hearing loss.纯音测听而不测试骨导阈值:使用噪声中的数字测试来检测传导性听力损失。
Int J Audiol. 2020 Oct;59(10):801-808. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1783585. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
7
Perceptual separation of sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.感音神经性听力损失与听觉神经病谱系障碍的感知分离
Laryngoscope. 2016 Jun;126(6):1420-5. doi: 10.1002/lary.25595. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
8
Simplified cochlear frequency selectivity assessment in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.正常听力和听力障碍者的简化耳蜗频率选择性评估。
Int J Audiol. 2024 May;63(5):326-333. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2197146. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
9
Automated Adaptive Wideband Acoustic Stapedius Reflex Thresholds in Adults With Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.成人正常听力和感音神经性听力损失的自动自适应宽带声镫骨肌反射阈值。
Ear Hear. 2023;44(4):740-750. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001321. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
10
[Establishment of the characterization of an adult digits-in-noise test based on internet].
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb;32(3):202-205. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.03.011.

本文引用的文献

1
Simplified cochlear frequency selectivity assessment in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.正常听力和听力障碍者的简化耳蜗频率选择性评估。
Int J Audiol. 2024 May;63(5):326-333. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2197146. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
2
Global use and outcomes of the hearWHO mHealth hearing test.全球范围内hearWHO移动健康听力测试的使用情况及结果。
Digit Health. 2022 Sep 13;8:20552076221113204. doi: 10.1177/20552076221113204. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
3
Sensitivity and specificity of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ5) for screening hearing in adults.
言语、空间和听觉质量量表(SSQ5)筛查成人听力的敏感性和特异性。
Codas. 2022 Feb 28;34(4):e20210106. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021106. eCollection 2022.
4
Calibration and initial validation of a low-cost computer-based screening audiometer coupled to consumer insert phone-earmuff combination for boothless audiometry.一种低成本的基于计算机的筛查听力计与消费者插入式手机耳罩组合的校准和初步验证,用于无隔间听力测量。
Int J Audiol. 2022 Oct;61(10):850-858. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1969455. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
5
Clinical Importance of Binaural Information: Extending Auditory Assessment in Clinical Populations Using a Portable Testing Platform.双耳信息的临床重要性:使用便携式测试平台在临床人群中扩展听觉评估。
Am J Audiol. 2021 Sep 10;30(3):655-668. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-20-00168. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
6
The digit triplet test: a scoping review.数字三联体测试:范围综述。
Int J Audiol. 2021 Dec;60(12):946-963. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1902579. Epub 2021 Apr 11.
7
Changes in audiometric threshold and frequency selectivity correlate with cochlear histopathology in macaque monkeys with permanent noise-induced hearing loss.永久性噪声性听力损失猕猴的听阈和频率选择性变化与耳蜗组织病理学相关。
Hear Res. 2020 Dec;398:108082. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108082. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
8
Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-In-Noise Test Using Antiphasic Stimuli.使用反相刺激提高数字噪声测试的灵敏度
Ear Hear. 2020 Mar/Apr;41(2):442-450. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000775.
9
Toward Routine Assessments of Auditory Filter Shape.迈向听觉滤波器形状的常规评估。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Feb 26;62(2):442-455. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-18-0092.
10
Perspectives on the Pure-Tone Audiogram.纯音听力图的观点
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Jul/Aug;28(7):655-671. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16061.