Suppr超能文献

儿童急性哮喘临床严重程度量表的属性及可靠性评估。

Evaluation of the properties and reliability of a clinical severity scale for acute asthma in children.

作者信息

Bishop J, Carlin J, Nolan T

机构信息

Melbourne University Department of Paediatrics, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jan;45(1):71-6. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90190-x.

Abstract

The inter-observer agreement (reliability) and validity of a clinical asthma severity scale (ASS) derived from separate scores of wheeze, heart rate and accessory muscle use (each on a 4-point scale) were studied in 60 children aged between 6 months and 17 years (mean 5.4 years). Independent assessments of these clinical parameters were made by two paediatricians, and they also rated patients as having a mild, moderate, severe or very severe acute episode (clinical judgement rating, CJR). Oxygen saturation (SaO2) was measured concurrently by a Biox 3700 pulse oximeter and readings were categorized as mild (SaO2 greater than or equal to 94%), moderate (91-93%) and severe (less than 91%). Agreement between clinicians was assessed by the weighted kappa statistic (kappa W). Agreement for the ASS score compared to the severity grade obtained from SaO2 was slight (kappa W = 0.34) and compared to CJR the kappa W was 0.55. An ASS score of moderate or worse (greater than 3) had sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 50% for prediction of admission. The maximum frequency and duration of nebulizer therapy following admission were significantly greater for severe patients than for moderate patients. Length of hospital stay did not reflect the ASS score in the emergency department but total duration of functional disability increased with ASS score. The substitution of an adjusted heart rate score for the raw heart rate score used in ASS detracted from scale performance. The ASS is an imprecise but reasonable quantitative measure of the severity of an acute episode of asthma.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在60名年龄在6个月至17岁(平均5.4岁)的儿童中,研究了一种临床哮喘严重程度量表(ASS)的观察者间一致性(可靠性)和有效性,该量表源自喘息、心率和辅助肌使用情况的单独评分(每项均采用4分制)。两名儿科医生对这些临床参数进行了独立评估,他们还将患者评定为患有轻度、中度、重度或极重度急性发作(临床判断评级,CJR)。同时使用Biox 3700脉搏血氧仪测量血氧饱和度(SaO2),读数分为轻度(SaO2大于或等于94%)、中度(91 - 93%)和重度(小于91%)。通过加权kappa统计量(kappa W)评估临床医生之间的一致性。与从SaO2获得的严重程度等级相比,ASS评分的一致性轻微(kappa W = 0.34),与CJR相比,kappa W为0.55。ASS评分为中度或更差(大于3)时,预测入院的敏感性为97%,特异性为50%。入院后重度患者雾化治疗的最大频率和持续时间显著高于中度患者。住院时间在急诊科并不能反映ASS评分,但功能残疾的总持续时间随ASS评分增加。用调整后的心率评分替代ASS中使用的原始心率评分会降低量表性能。ASS是一种对哮喘急性发作严重程度的不精确但合理的定量测量方法。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验