Marson Anthony G, Al-Kharusi Asya M, Alwaidh Muna, Appleton Richard, Baker Gus A, Chadwick David W, Cramp Celia, Cockerell Oliver C, Cooper Paul N, Doughty Julie, Eaton Barbara, Gamble Carrol, Goulding Peter J, Howell Stephen J L, Hughes Adrian, Jackson Margaret, Jacoby Ann, Kellett Mark, Lawson Geoffrey R, Leach John Paul, Nicolaides Paola, Roberts Richard, Shackley Phil, Shen Jing, Smith David F, Smith Philip E M, Smith Catrin Tudur, Vanoli Alessandra, Williamson Paula R
Division of Neurological Science, University of Liverpool, UK.
Lancet. 2007 Mar 24;369(9566):1016-26. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60461-9.
Valproate is widely accepted as a drug of first choice for patients with generalised onset seizures, and its broad spectrum of efficacy means it is recommended for patients with seizures that are difficult to classify. Lamotrigine and topiramate are also thought to possess broad spectrum activity. The SANAD study aimed to compare the longer-term effects of these drugs in patients with generalised onset seizures or seizures that are difficult to classify.
SANAD was an unblinded randomised controlled trial in hospital-based outpatient clinics in the UK. Arm B of the study recruited 716 patients for whom valproate was considered to be standard treatment. Patients were randomly assigned to valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate between Jan 12, 1999, and Aug 31, 2004, and follow-up data were obtained up to Jan 13, 2006. Primary outcomes were time to treatment failure, and time to 1-year remission, and analysis was by both intention to treat and per protocol. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN38354748.
For time to treatment failure, valproate was significantly better than topiramate (hazard ratio 1.57 [95% CI 1.19-2.08]), but there was no significant difference between valproate and lamotrigine (1.25 [0.94-1.68]). For patients with an idiopathic generalised epilepsy, valproate was significantly better than both lamotrigine (1.55 [1.07-2.24] and topiramate (1.89 [1.32-2.70]). For time to 12-month remission valproate was significantly better than lamotrigine overall (0.76 [0.62-0.94]), and for the subgroup with an idiopathic generalised epilepsy 0.68 (0.53-0.89). But there was no significant difference between valproate and topiramate in either the analysis overall or for the subgroup with an idiopathic generalised epilepsy.
Valproate is better tolerated than topiramate and more efficacious than lamotrigine, and should remain the drug of first choice for many patients with generalised and unclassified epilepsies. However, because of known potential adverse effects of valproate during pregnancy, the benefits for seizure control in women of childbearing years should be considered.
丙戊酸盐被广泛公认为全身性发作患者的首选药物,其广泛的疗效意味着它被推荐用于难以分类的癫痫发作患者。拉莫三嗪和托吡酯也被认为具有广谱活性。SANAD研究旨在比较这些药物对全身性发作或难以分类的癫痫发作患者的长期影响。
SANAD是在英国医院门诊进行的一项非盲随机对照试验。该研究的B组招募了716名被认为丙戊酸盐是标准治疗药物的患者。在1999年1月12日至2004年8月31日期间,患者被随机分配接受丙戊酸盐、拉莫三嗪或托吡酯治疗,并在2006年1月13日前获得随访数据。主要结局指标是治疗失败时间和1年缓解时间,分析采用意向性分析和符合方案分析。本研究已注册为国际标准随机对照试验,编号为ISRCTN38354748。
在治疗失败时间方面,丙戊酸盐显著优于托吡酯(风险比1.57 [95%可信区间1.19 - 2.08]),但丙戊酸盐与拉莫三嗪之间无显著差异(1.25 [0.94 - 1.68])。对于特发性全身性癫痫患者,丙戊酸盐显著优于拉莫三嗪(1.55 [1.07 - 2.24])和托吡酯(1.89 [1.32 - 2.70])。在12个月缓解时间方面,丙戊酸盐总体上显著优于拉莫三嗪(0.76 [0.62 - 0.94]),对于特发性全身性癫痫亚组为0.68(0.53 - 0.89)。但在总体分析或特发性全身性癫痫亚组分析中,丙戊酸盐与托吡酯之间均无显著差异。
丙戊酸盐的耐受性优于托吡酯,疗效优于拉莫三嗪,对于许多全身性和未分类癫痫患者应仍是首选药物。然而,鉴于丙戊酸盐在孕期已知的潜在不良反应,应考虑其对育龄期女性癫痫控制的益处。