Tutor-Crespo Maria J, Hermida Jesús, Tutor J Carlos
Laboratorio Central, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2007;21(2):119-23. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20115.
The debate continues regarding the possible interference of phenytoin metabolites in phenytoin immunoassays, and its clinical importance for patients with renal failure. The aim of this study was to compare the results obtained using the Abbott fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA), Dade enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT), and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to establish the significance of the differences in conditions of renal failure. Thirty-six adult patients who had been treated with phenytoin and whose renal function ranged from normal to severely impaired were chosen for this study. In accordance with previously established validation criteria for analytical methods for the determination of drugs, a 15% bias from the HPLC phenytoin values was considered an acceptable limit. The mean (+/-SEM) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of the patients was 37.5+/-4.6 mL/min (range = 10-102 mL/min). The mean values found using FPIA (10.8+/-1.2 microg/mL) and EMIT (10.8+/-1.3 microg/mL) presented acceptable deviations with respect to HPLC (10.5+/-1.2 microg/mL), and a high correlation was found among the results (N = 36) of the different methods (r > or = 0.987, P < 0.001). An FPIA deviation above the 15% bias limit with respect to HPLC was found only in two cases with very low serum phenytoin concentrations and low GFR values (< 20 mL/min), although it does not appear to be important in terms of adjusting drug dosage. According to our data, FPIA and EMIT gave accurate results for total phenytoin in serum samples from patients with renal failure.
关于苯妥英代谢物对苯妥英免疫测定可能产生的干扰及其对肾衰竭患者的临床重要性,相关争论仍在继续。本研究的目的是比较使用雅培荧光偏振免疫测定法(FPIA)、达德酶放大免疫测定技术(EMIT)和高效液相色谱法(HPLC)所获得的结果,以确定肾衰竭情况下差异的显著性。本研究选取了36例接受过苯妥英治疗且肾功能从正常到严重受损的成年患者。根据先前确立的药物测定分析方法验证标准,与HPLC法测定的苯妥英值偏差15%被视为可接受限度。患者的平均(±标准误)肾小球滤过率(GFR)为37.5±4.6 mL/分钟(范围 = 10 - 102 mL/分钟)。使用FPIA法(10.8±1.2 μg/mL)和EMIT法(10.8±1.3 μg/mL)测得的平均值与HPLC法(10.5±1.2 μg/mL)相比呈现出可接受的偏差,并且在不同方法(N = 36)的结果之间发现了高度相关性(r≥0.987,P < 0.001)。仅在两例血清苯妥英浓度极低且GFR值低(<20 mL/分钟)的情况下,发现FPIA法相对于HPLC法的偏差超过了15%的偏差限度,不过就调整药物剂量而言,这似乎并不重要。根据我们的数据,FPIA法和EMIT法对于肾衰竭患者血清样本中的总苯妥英给出了准确的结果。