Nathan Nathalie, Odin Isabelle
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France.
Drugs. 2007;67(5):701-23. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767050-00005.
In developed countries, the choice of an anaesthetic agent for induction of anaesthesia remains based mainly on its pharmacodynamic properties. Until now, cardiovascular effects were the main factor in this decision. However, other factors, such as the depth of anaesthesia and effects on cortisol synthesis, can modify this simplistic view. A better understanding of the relationships between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these drugs, and the availability of new techniques, such as target-controlled infusions of anaesthetic drugs and inhalation induction, have led practitioners to the understanding that the way a drug is administered is a far more important factor for maintaining haemodynamic stability than the specific agent used. The ability of a drug to maintain spontaneous ventilation and to relax the upper airway is another factor in this decision, especially when considering difficult intubation, laryngeal mask insertion or tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blockade. Beyond the factors mentioned above, anaesthetists adapt current practice to suit patients' willingness to comply with anaesthesia and to avoid the adverse effects that are most often feared by the patient. Although most practitioners are not concerned with the cost of anaesthesia, cost-containment policies have led some institutions to restrict the use of the more expensive drugs to particular indications. However, this is too simplistic an approach for the reduction of global costs, as other direct medical costs, such as those for staffing, form a greater proportion of total costs than do direct drug costs. Cost-benefit and cost-efficacy studies of the anaesthetics used for induction of anaesthesia are needed to help anaesthetists to choose a drug based on both cost and pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic properties.
在发达国家,用于麻醉诱导的麻醉剂的选择仍然主要基于其药效学特性。到目前为止,心血管效应是这一决策的主要因素。然而,其他因素,如麻醉深度和对皮质醇合成的影响,可能会改变这种过于简单的观点。对这些药物的药代动力学和药效学之间关系的更好理解,以及新技术的出现,如麻醉药物的靶控输注和吸入诱导,使从业者认识到,与所使用的特定药物相比,药物的给药方式对于维持血流动力学稳定性是一个更为重要的因素。药物维持自主通气和松弛上呼吸道的能力是这一决策中的另一个因素,尤其是在考虑困难插管、喉罩置入或无神经肌肉阻滞的气管插管时。除了上述因素外,麻醉医生会调整当前的做法,以适应患者对麻醉的接受程度,并避免患者最常担心的不良反应。尽管大多数从业者并不关心麻醉费用,但成本控制政策已导致一些机构将更昂贵药物限制用于特定适应症。然而,这对于降低总体成本来说是一种过于简单的方法,因为其他直接医疗成本,如人员配备成本,在总成本中所占比例比直接药物成本更大。需要对用于麻醉诱导的麻醉剂进行成本效益和成本效果研究,以帮助麻醉医生根据成本以及药效学或药代动力学特性来选择药物。