Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚神经科医生对癫痫与驾驶的看法、态度及做法。

Opinions, attitudes and practices of Australian neurologists with regard to epilepsy and driving.

作者信息

Beran R G, Ainley L A E, Beran M E

机构信息

Strategic Health Evaluators and Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2007 Apr;37(4):251-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01331.x.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Austroads Guidelines for fitness to drive were promulgated in 2003. Epilepsy was one of the conditions included and this paper reports results of a survey of Australian neurologists regarding opinions and practices relevant to the guidelines.

METHODS

The survey was developed, piloted and Human Research Ethics Committee approved. Members of the Australian Association of Neurologists received three mailings and results were analysed.

RESULTS

Almost 70% of 236 surveyed indicated assessment of epilepsy and driving with <9% not doing so--establishing approximately 77% response for eligible neurologists. Most questions achieved 90% response. Almost 90% respondents assessed epilepsy and 70% found the guidelines helpful. Seventy-seven per cent endorsed doctor assessors although half discounted General Practitioners as insufficiently knowledgeable and half advocated that only neurologists evaluate potential drivers with epilepsy. Most respondents supported reporting recalcitrant patients; yet only <30% did so. Three-quarters favoured licences carrying a warning to self-report and two-thirds felt that product information should identify driving implications. Although many questions attracted expected responses, the surprise was the large undecided numbers, which were greater than expected. Neurologists were more lenient than prescribed by the guidelines with neither consensus for controlled epilepsy nor mandatory driving restrictions.

CONCLUSION

Respondents supplied predictable answers regarding ideal circumstances; yet most did not report recalcitrant patients. Most claimed to adhere to the guidelines and yet advocated more lenient driving restrictions that may allow preventable accidents. There was agreement between neurologists and guidelines for more rigorous restrictions for commercial drivers although again neurologists were more lenient. There is need for prospective research on epilepsy and driving.

摘要

引言

澳大利亚道路与交通研究协会(Austroads)的驾驶适宜性指南于2003年颁布。癫痫是其中涵盖的病症之一,本文报告了一项针对澳大利亚神经科医生的调查结果,内容涉及与该指南相关的意见和做法。

方法

该调查经过设计、预试验并获得了人类研究伦理委员会的批准。澳大利亚神经科医生协会的成员收到了三次邮件通知,对结果进行了分析。

结果

在236名接受调查的医生中,近70%表示会对癫痫与驾驶情况进行评估,不到9%的医生未进行评估,这表明符合条件的神经科医生的回应率约为77%。大多数问题的回应率达到了90%。近90%的受访者会评估癫痫情况,70%的受访者认为该指南有帮助。77%的受访者认可医生作为评估者,尽管有一半的人认为全科医生知识不够丰富而不予考虑,另一半人则主张只有神经科医生才能对潜在的癫痫患者驾驶者进行评估。大多数受访者支持报告顽固不化的患者,但实际这样做的人不到30%。四分之三的人赞成驾照上带有自我报告的警告,三分之二的人认为产品信息应注明驾驶相关影响。尽管许多问题得到了预期的回应,但令人惊讶的是有大量未决的情况,数量比预期的要多。神经科医生比指南规定的更为宽松,对于癫痫得到控制的情况没有达成共识,也没有强制实施驾驶限制。

结论

受访者对于理想情况给出了可预测的答案,但大多数人并未报告顽固不化的患者。大多数人声称遵守该指南,但同时又主张实行更为宽松的驾驶限制,这可能会导致可预防的事故。神经科医生与指南在对商业驾驶者实施更严格限制方面达成了一致,不过神经科医生的态度再次更为宽松。有必要对癫痫与驾驶进行前瞻性研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验