Broadhurst Norm A, Barton Christopher A, Rowett Debra, Yelland Lisa, Matin David K, Gialamas Angela, Beilby Justin J
Department of Orthopaedics, Finders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Mar 27;8:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-12.
The aim of this study was to assess the impact that Academic Detailing (AD) had on General Practitioners' use of diagnostic imaging for shoulder complaints in general practice and their knowledge and confidence to manage shoulder pain.
One-to-one Academic Detailing (AD) for management of shoulder pain was delivered to 87 General Practitioners (GPs) in metropolitan Adelaide, South Australia, together with locally developed clinical guidelines and a video/DVD on how to examine the shoulder. Three months after the initial AD a further small group or an individual follow up session was offered. A 10-item questionnaire to assess knowledge about the shoulders was administered before, immediately after, and 3 months after AD, together with questions to assess confidence to manage shoulder complaints. The number of requests for plain film (X-ray) and ultrasound (US) imaging of the shoulder was obtained for the intervention group as well as a random comparison group of 90 GP's from the same two Divisions. The change in the rate of requests was assessed using a log Poisson GEE with adjustment for clustering at the practice level. A linear mixed effects model was used to analyse changes in knowledge.
In an average week 54% of GPs reported seeing fewer than 6 patients with shoulder problems. Mean (SD) GP knowledge score before, immediately after and 3-months after AD, was 6.2/10 (1.5); 8.6/10 (0.96) and; 7.2/10 (1.5) respectively (p < 0.0001). Three months after AD, GPs reported feeling able to take a more meaningful history, more confident managing shoulder pain, and felt their management of shoulder pain had improved. Requests for ultrasound imaging were approximately 43.8% higher in the period 2 years before detailing compared to six months after detailing (p < 0.0001), but an upward trend toward baseline was observed in the period 6 months to 1 year after AD. There was no statistically significant change in the rate of requests from before to after AD for plain-radiographs (p = 0.11). No significant changes in the rate of requests over time were observed in the control groups.
These results provide evidence that AD together with education materials and guidelines can improve GPs' knowledge and confidence to manage shoulder problems and reduce the use of imaging, at least in the short term.
本研究旨在评估学术推广(AD)对全科医生在普通门诊中针对肩部疾病使用诊断性影像学检查的影响,以及他们管理肩部疼痛的知识和信心。
对南澳大利亚阿德莱德大都市地区的87名全科医生(GP)进行一对一的肩部疼痛管理学术推广,同时提供当地制定的临床指南以及关于如何检查肩部的视频/ DVD。在首次学术推广三个月后,提供进一步的小组或个人随访课程。在学术推广前、推广后立即以及推广后3个月,发放一份包含10个项目的问卷,以评估有关肩部的知识,并设置问题评估管理肩部疾病的信心。获取干预组以及来自相同两个分区的90名全科医生的随机对照组的肩部X线平片和超声成像检查申请数量。使用对数泊松广义估计方程(GEE)并在诊所层面进行聚类调整来评估申请率的变化。使用线性混合效应模型分析知识的变化。
在平均一周内,54%的全科医生报告称看诊的肩部问题患者少于6例。学术推广前、推广后立即以及推广后3个月,全科医生的平均(标准差)知识得分分别为6.2/10(1.5)、8.6/10(0.96)和7.2/10(1.5)(p<0.0001)。学术推广3个月后,全科医生报告称能够获取更有意义的病史,管理肩部疼痛更有信心,并且感觉他们对肩部疼痛的管理有所改善。在推广前2年期间与推广后6个月期间相比,超声成像检查申请大约高43.8%(p<0.0001),但在学术推广后6个月至1年期间观察到申请率呈上升趋势并趋向于基线水平。学术推广前后X线平片检查申请率无统计学显著变化(p = 0.11)。对照组的申请率随时间未观察到显著变化。
这些结果提供了证据表明学术推广连同教育材料和指南可以提高全科医生管理肩部问题的知识和信心,并减少影像学检查的使用,至少在短期内如此。